Chhattisgarh HC: scrapping an ongoing recruitment needs real reasons, not just inconvenience
The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed a decision of Government Medical College, Ambikapur to cancel its 2022 recruitment advertisements for Class III and Class IV posts and shift the process to the State's Professional Examination Board (VYAPAM). The petitioners, candidates who had applied, cleared the earlier stages and were called for document verification, challenged the cancellation as arbitrary. The college's General Body had recorded that over one lakh applications had been received and that processing them would take too long, so the advertisements were cancelled. Justice Bibhu Datta Guru noted that a later official communication from the Dean put the actual figure at 55,335 applications against 448 posts, a figure the State could not reconcile with the one-lakh number used to justify the cancellation.
The Court held that while no candidate has an indefeasible right to appointment merely by participating in a selection process, and the State can revise its recruitment mechanism, the power to abandon an ongoing, substantially advanced selection cannot be exercised on an unexplained factual premise. Relying on the Supreme Court's decisions in Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India and Tej Prakash Pathak v. Rajasthan High Court, the Court held that such discretion remains subject to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and the State must show a rational, bona fide basis before it can lawfully discontinue a process at an advanced stage. The college was directed to resume and complete the earlier recruitment within three months.
Quick checkIn Aditya Saini v. State of Chhattisgarh, on what basis did the Chhattisgarh High Court quash the cancellation of an ongoing recruitment process?- Because candidates who clear a selection process always acquire an indefeasible right to appointment
- Because the State can never adopt VYAPAM or any other recruitment mechanism for government posts
- Because the recruitment rules expressly barred cancellation after a merit list was prepared
- Because the General Body's stated reason for cancelling, the volume of applications, was materially unexplained against the college's own later official figures, making the decision arbitrary
Show the answer ↓
Answer: D. The Court found that the respondents could not reconcile the figure used to justify cancellation with their own later official data, leaving the decision without a rational, bona fide foundation required under Articles 14 and 16.
Issued by Chhattisgarh High Court. If this summary and the source differ, the source is right — tell us and we will correct it.
Revising the month? All 178 legal updates from October 2026 →