22 days left — Registration closes 2026-10-31.

THE CONSTITUTIONArticle by article

The words on the left. What they mean on the right.

85 articles of the Constitution of India that matter most for CLAT, law school and the news, in the official text, each beside a plain-English reading and the judgments that shaped it.

Official text: The Constitution of India (diglot pocket edition), as on 1st May, 2024, incorporating amendments up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023, Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India. Amendment markers and footnotes are as printed there; open “Notes in the official text” under any article to see which amendment made a change.

The Preamble

We, the people of India

WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a 1[SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC] and to secure to all its citizens:

JUSTICE, social, economic and political;

LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;

EQUALITY of status and of opportunity;

and to promote among them all

FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the 2[unity and integrity of the Nation];

IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s.2, for "SOVEREIGN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC" (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).
  2. Subs. by s. 2, ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976], for "Unity of the Nation" (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).

In plain English

The Preamble says where the Constitution’s authority comes from (the people of India), what kind of State it creates (sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic, a republic), and what it is for: justice, liberty, equality and fraternity. “Socialist” and “secular”, and “and integrity”, were added by the Forty-second Amendment in 1976. In Kesavananda Bharati the Supreme Court treated the Preamble as part of the Constitution and a guide to its basic structure.

Judgments The Berubari reference (1960) · The basic structure case (1973)

Part I

The Union and its territory

What India is, and how its States can be made, joined, divided or renamed.

Article 1 Name and territory of the Union

(1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.

1[(2) The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule.]

(3) The territory of India shall comprise— (a) the territories of the States; 2[(b) the Union territories specified in the First Schedule;

and] (c) such other territories as may be acquired.

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 2, for cl. (2) (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
  2. Subs. by s. 2 ibid. [the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956] for sub-clause (b) (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

India is a “Union of States”, not a federation that States joined by agreement, so no State has a right to leave. Its territory is the States, the Union territories and any territory India later acquires; the States and Union territories themselves are listed in the First Schedule.

Judgments The Berubari reference (1960)

#article-1

Article 3 Formation of new States and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing States

Parliament may by law— (a) form a new State by separation of territory from any

State or by uniting two or more States or parts of States or by uniting any territory to a part of any State;

(b) increase the area of any State; (c) diminish the area of any State;

(d) alter the boundaries of any State; (e) alter the name of any State:

1[Provided that no Bill for the purpose shall be introduced in either House of Parliament except on the recommendation of the President and unless, where the proposal contained in the Bill affects the area, boundaries or name of any of the States12***, the Bill has been referred by the President to the Legislature of that State for expressing its views thereon within such period as may be specified in the reference or within such further period as the President may allow and the period so specified or allowed has expired.]

2[Explanation I.—In this article, in clauses (a) to (e), “State” includes a Union territory, but in the proviso, “State” does not include a Union territory.

Explanation II.—The power conferred on Parliament by clause (a) includes the power to form a new State or Union territory by uniting a part of any State or Union territory to any other State or Union territory.]

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Fifth Amendment) Act, 1955, s. 2, for the proviso (w.e.f. 24-12-1955).
  2. Ins. by the Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 1966, s. 2 (w.e.f. 27-8-1966).

In plain English

Parliament can create new States, merge or split them, change their boundaries or rename them by an ordinary law. The President must recommend the Bill and refer it to the affected State Legislature for its views, but Parliament is not bound by those views. Ceding Indian territory to another country is different: that needs a constitutional amendment.

Judgments The Berubari reference (1960)

#article-3

Part II

Citizenship

Who was a citizen on 26 January 1950, and who decides everything after that.

Article 5 Citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution

At the commencement of this Constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of India and— (a) who was born in the territory of India; or (b) either of whose parents was born in the territory of India; or (c) who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than five years immediately preceding such commencement, shall be a citizen of India.

In plain English

This article fixed who was a citizen when the Constitution began: a person domiciled in India who was born here, had a parent born here, or had lived here for five years. It speaks only about that moment.

#article-5

Article 11 Parliament to regulate the right of citizenship by law

Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Part shall derogate from the power of Parliament to make any provision with respect to the acquisition and termination of citizenship and all other matters relating to citizenship.

In plain English

Parliament has full power to make laws on acquiring and losing citizenship. The Citizenship Act, 1955 and its amendments are made under this power.

#article-11

Part III

Fundamental rights: equality

The rights in Part III can be enforced in court. These first articles define “the State” and promise equality.

Article 12 Definition

In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires, “the State” includes the Government and Parliament of India and the Government and the Legislature of each of the States and all local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.

In plain English

“The State” means the Union and State governments and legislatures, and every local or other authority. Courts read “other authorities” to include bodies that are financially, functionally and administratively controlled by the government, such as many public sector companies. Fundamental rights are mostly enforced against the State, not private persons.

#article-12

Article 13 Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights

(1) All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void. (2) The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. (3) In this article, unless the context otherwise requires,—

(a) “law” includes any Ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having in the territory of India the force of law;

(b) “laws in force” includes laws passed or made by a Legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. 1[(4) Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under article 368.]

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Ins. by the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971, s. 2 (w.e.f. 5-11-1971).

In plain English

Any law that takes away or cuts down a fundamental right is void to that extent, whether it was made before or after 1950. “Law” includes ordinances, rules, notifications and even customs. Clause (4), added in 1971, says constitutional amendments are not “law” for this purpose; the basic structure doctrine now sets the limit on amendments instead.

Judgments The First Amendment case (1951) · The Golaknath case (1967) · The basic structure case (1973)

#article-13

Article 14 Equality before law

The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

In plain English

Everyone, citizen or not, is equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the laws. The State may classify people differently only if the classification is reasonable and connected to the law’s purpose. Since Maneka Gandhi, arbitrary State action is also treated as a breach of Article 14.

Judgments The passport case (1978) · The triple talaq case (2017) · The adultery case (2018)

#article-14

Article 15 Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth

(1) The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them. (2) No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them, be subject to any disability, liability, restriction or condition with regard to—

(a) access to shops, public restaurants, hotels and places of public entertainment; or

(b) the use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads and places of public resort maintained wholly or partly out of State funds or dedicated to the use of the general public.

(3) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.

1[(4) Nothing in this article or in clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.]

2[(5) Nothing in this article or in sub-clause (g) of clause (1) of article 19 shall prevent the State from making any special provision, by law, for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes in so far as such special provisions relate to their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the State, other than the minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of article 30.]

3[(6) Nothing in this article or sub-clause (g) of clause (1) of article 19 or clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the State from making,—

(a) any special provision for the advancement of any economically weaker sections of citizens other than the classes mentioned in clauses (4) and (5); and

(b) any special provision for the advancement of any economically weaker sections of citizens other than the classes mentioned in clauses (4) and (5) in so far as such special provisions relate to their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the State, other than the minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of article 30, which in the case of reservation would be in addition to the existing reservations and subject to a maximum of ten per cent. of the total seats in each category.

Explanation.—For the purposes of this article and article 16, "economically weaker sections" shall be such as may be notified by the State from time to time on the basis of family income and other indicators of economic disadvantage.]

Notes in the official text (3)
  1. Added by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951, s. 2 (w.e.f. 18-6-1951).
  2. Ins. by the Constitution (Ninety-third Amendment) Act, 2005, s. 2 (w.e.f. 20-1-2006).
  3. Ins. by the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019, s. 2 (w.e.f. 14-1-2019).

In plain English

The State cannot discriminate against citizens only on religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, and no citizen can be kept out of shops, hotels, wells or public places on those grounds. But the State may make special provisions for women and children, for socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (including in admissions), and, since 2019, for economically weaker sections, up to ten per cent.

Judgments The Communal G.O. case (1951) · The Mandal case (1992) · The Section 377 case (2018)

#article-15

Article 16 Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment

(1) There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State.

(2) No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, residence or any of them, be ineligible for, or discriminated against in respect of, any employment or office under the State.

(3) Nothing in this article shall prevent Parliament from making any law prescribing, in regard to a class or classes of employment or appointment to an office 1[under the Government of, or any local or other authority within, a State or Union territory, any requirement as to residence within that State or Union territory] prior to such employment or appointment.

(4) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State.

2[(4A) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for reservation 3[in matters of promotion, with consequential seniority, to any class] or classes of posts in the services under the State in favour of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes which, in the opinion of the State, are not adequately represented in the services under the State.]

4[(4B) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from considering any unfilled vacancies of a year which are reserved for being filled up in that year in accordance with any provision for reservation made under clause (4) or clause (4A) as a separate class of vacancies to be filled up in any succeeding year or years and such class of vacancies shall not be considered together with the vacancies of the year in which they are being filled up for determining the ceiling of fifty per cent. reservation on total number of vacancies of that year.]

(5) Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any law which provides that the incumbent of an office in connection with the affairs of any religious or denominational institution or any member of the governing body thereof shall be a person professing a particular religion or belonging to a particular denomination.

5[(6) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any economically weaker sections of citizens other than the classes mentioned in clause (4), in addition to the existing reservation and subject to a maximum of ten per cent. of the posts in each category.]

Notes in the official text (5)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch., for "under any State specified in the First Schedule or any local or other authority within its territory, any requirement as to residence within that State" (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
  2. Ins. by the Constitution (Seventy-seventh Amendment) Act, 1995, s. 2 (w.e.f. 17-6-1995).
  3. Subs. by the Constitution (Eighty-fifth Amendment) Act, 2001, s. 2, for certain words (retrospectively) (w.e.f. 17-6-1995).
  4. Ins. by the Constitution (Eighty-first Amendment) Act, 2000, s. 2 (w.e.f. 9-6-2000).
  5. Ins. by the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019, s. 3 (w.e.f. 14-1-2019).

In plain English

All citizens have equal opportunity in government jobs. The State may still reserve posts for backward classes that are not adequately represented, reserve promotions for SCs and STs, carry forward unfilled reserved vacancies outside the 50 per cent ceiling, and, since 2019, reserve up to ten per cent for economically weaker sections.

Judgments The Mandal case (1992) · The sub-classification case (2024)

#article-16

Article 17 Abolition of Untouchability

“Untouchability” is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

In plain English

“Untouchability” is abolished and practising it in any form is forbidden; enforcing any disability arising from it is an offence. This right can be enforced against private persons too.

#article-17

Article 18 Abolition of titles

(1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.

(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.

(3) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.

(4) No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.

In plain English

The State cannot confer titles, except military or academic distinctions, and citizens cannot accept titles from foreign States. The Supreme Court has held that national awards such as the Bharat Ratna and Padma awards are not “titles” in this sense, but cannot be used as prefixes or suffixes to names.

#article-18

Part III

Fundamental rights: freedom

The six freedoms of Article 19, and the guarantees of life, liberty and fair criminal process.

Article 19 Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc

(1) All citizens shall have the right—

(a) to freedom of speech and expression;

(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;

(c) to form associations or unions 1[or co-operative societies];

(d) to move freely throughout the territory of India;

(e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India; 2[and]

3[(f)* * * * *]

(g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.

4[(2) Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of 5[the sovereignty and integrity of India], the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.]

(3) Nothing in sub-clause (b) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of 5[the sovereignty and integrity of India or] public order, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.

(4) Nothing in sub-clause (c) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of 5[the sovereignty and integrity of India or] public order or morality, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.

(5) Nothing in 6[sub-clauses (d) and (e)] of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of any of the rights conferred by the said sub-clauses either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe.

(6) Nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the general public, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause, and, in particular, 7[nothing in the said sub-clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it relates to, or prevent the State from making any law relating to,—

(i) the professional or technical qualifications necessary for practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business; or

(ii) the carrying on by the State, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the State, of any trade, business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.]

Notes in the official text (7)
  1. Ins. by the Constitution (Ninety-seventh Amendment) Act, 2011, s. 2 (w.e.f. 8-2-2012).
  2. Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 2 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  3. Sub-clause (f) omitted by s.2, ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978] (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  4. Subs. by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951, s. 3, for cl. (2) (with retrospective effect).
  5. Ins. by the Constitution (Sixteenth Amendment) Act, 1963, s. 2 (w.e.f. 5-10-1963).
  6. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 2, for "sub-clauses (d), (e) and (f)" (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  7. Subs. by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951, s. 3, for certain words (w.e.f. 18-6-1951).

In plain English

Citizens have six freedoms: speech and expression; peaceful assembly without arms; forming associations, unions or co-operatives; moving freely and settling anywhere in India; and practising any profession, trade or business. (The right to property, sub-clause (f), was removed in 1978.) Each freedom can be limited only by a “reasonable restriction” on the grounds its own clause lists, such as public order, decency or the sovereignty and integrity of India for speech.

Judgments The Cross Roads case (1950) · The sedition case (1962) · The Section 66A case (2015) · The internet shutdown case (2020)

#article-19

Article 20 Protection in respect of conviction for offences

(1) No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.

(2) No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.

(3) No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

In plain English

Three protections for anyone accused of a crime: no conviction or heavier punishment under a law made after the act (no retrospective criminal law); no prosecution and punishment twice for the same offence; and no person accused of an offence can be forced to be a witness against himself. Since 1978 this article cannot be suspended even in an emergency.

#article-20

Article 21 Protection of life and personal liberty

No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

In plain English

No person can be deprived of life or personal liberty except by a procedure established by law. Since Maneka Gandhi, that procedure must be fair, just and reasonable. The courts have read many rights into Article 21, including speedy trial, legal aid, livelihood, shelter, a clean environment, privacy and dying with dignity. It cannot be suspended even in an emergency.

Judgments The preventive detention case (1950) · The passport case (1978) · The pavement dwellers case (1985) · The right to privacy case (2017) · The living will case (2018)

#article-21

Article 21A 1[Right to education

The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years in such manner as the State may, by law, determine.]

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Ins. by the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002, s. 2 (w.e.f. 1-4-2010).

In plain English

Free and compulsory education for every child aged six to fourteen is a fundamental right, delivered in the way the State decides by law. It was added in 2002 and came into force in 2010, together with the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

Judgments The right to education case (1993)

#article-21a

Article 22 Protection against arrest and detention in certain cases

(1) No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest nor shall he be denied the right to consult, and to be defended by, a legal practitioner of his choice.

(2) Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.

(3) Nothing in clauses (1) and (2) shall apply—

(a) to any person who for the time being is an enemy alien; or

(b) to any person who is arrested or detained under any law providing for preventive detention.

1(4) No law providing for preventive detention shall authorise the detention of a person for a longer period than three months unless—

(a) an Advisory Board consisting of persons who are, or have been, or are qualified to be appointed as, Judges of a High Court has reported before the expiration of the said period of three months that there is in its opinion sufficient cause for such detention:

Provided that nothing in this sub-clause shall authorise the detention of any person beyond the maximum period prescribed by any law made by Parliament under sub-clause (b) of clause (7); or

(b) such person is detained in accordance with the provisions of any law made by Parliament under sub-clauses (a) and (b) of clause (7).

(5) When any person is detained in pursuance of an order made under any law providing for preventive detention, the authority making the order shall, as soon as may be, communicate to such person the grounds on which the order has been made and shall afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order.

(6) Nothing in clause (5) shall require the authority making any such order as is referred to in that clause to disclose facts which such authority considers to be against the public interest to disclose.

(7) Parliament may by law prescribe— 2(a) the circumstances under which, and the class or classes of cases

in which, a person may be detained for a period longer than three months under any law providing for preventive detention without obtaining the opinion of an Advisory Board in accordance with the provisions of sub-clause (a) of clause (4);

3(b) the maximum period for which any person may in any class or classes of cases be detained under any law providing for preventive detention; and

4(c) the procedure to be followed by an Advisory Board in an inquiry under 5sub-clause (a) of clause (4).

Notes in the official text (5)
  1. Cl. (4) shall stand substituted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 3 (date yet to be notified) as— "(4) No law providing for preventive detention shall authorise the detention of a person for a longer period than two months unless an Advisory Board constituted in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief Justice of the appropriate High Court has reported before the expiration of the said period of two months that there is in its opinion sufficient cause for such detention: Provided that an Advisory Board shall consist of a Chairman and not less than two other members, and the Chairman shall be a serving Judge of the appropriate High Court and the other members shall be serving or retired Judges of any High Court : Provided further that nothing in this clause shall authorise the detention of any person beyond the maximum period prescribed by any law made by Parliament under sub-clause (a) of clause (7). Explanation.—In this clause, "appropriate High Court" means,— (i) in the case of the detention of a person in pursuance of an order of detention made by the Government of India or an officer or authority subordinate to that Government, the High Court for the Union territory of Dehli; (ii) in the case of the detention of a person in pursuance of an order of detention made by the Government of any State (other than a Union territory), the High Court for that State; and (iii) in the case of the detention of a person in pursuance of an order of detention made by the administrator of a Union territory or an officer or authority subordinate to such administrator, such High Court as may be specified by or under any law made by Parliament in this behalf.".
  2. Sub-clause (a) shall stand omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 3(b)(i) (date to be notified).
  3. Sub-clause (b) shall stand re-lettered as sub-clause (a) by s. 3(b)(ii), ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978] (date to be notified).
  4. Sub-clause (c) shall stand re-lettered as sub-clause (b) by s. 3(b)(iii), ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978] (date to be notified).
  5. Sub-clause (a) of clause (4) shall stand substituted as "clause (4)" by s. 3(b)(iii), ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978] (date to be notified).

In plain English

A person who is arrested must be told the grounds, may consult a lawyer of their choice, and must be brought before a magistrate within 24 hours. These two protections do not apply to preventive detention, which has its own rules: an Advisory Board must approve detention beyond three months, and the detainee must be told the grounds and allowed to make a representation. The footnotes record changes made by the Forty-fourth Amendment that have never been brought into force.

Judgments The preventive detention case (1950) · The arrest guidelines case (1996)

#article-22

Part III

Fundamental rights: against exploitation, and religion

Trafficking, forced labour and child labour; then freedom of conscience and religion.

Article 23 Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour

(1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

(2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purposes, and in imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste or class or any of them.

In plain English

Trafficking in human beings, begar (forced unpaid labour) and similar forced labour are banned and punishable. The Supreme Court has held that paying less than the minimum wage can amount to forced labour. The State may still require compulsory public service, without discrimination.

Judgments The Asiad workers case (1982) · The bonded labour case (1983)

#article-23

Article 24 Prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc

No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment.

In plain English

No child below fourteen may be employed in a factory, a mine or any other hazardous work. Like Articles 17 and 23, it applies to private employers as well as the State.

#article-24

Article 25 Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion

(1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion.

(2) Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law—

(a) regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice;

(b) providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.

Explanation I.—The wearing and carrying of kirpans shall be deemed to be included in the profession of the Sikh religion.

Explanation II.—In sub-clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly.

In plain English

Everyone has freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practise and propagate religion, subject to public order, morality, health and the other fundamental rights. The State may still regulate secular activities linked to religion, and make laws for social reform and for opening Hindu temples to all Hindus. Carrying a kirpan is part of professing Sikhism.

Judgments The Sabarimala case (2018) · The triple talaq case (2017)

#article-25

Article 26 Freedom to manage religious affairs

Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right—

(a) to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;

(b) to manage its own affairs in matters of religion;

(c) to own and acquire movable and immovable property; and

(d) to administer such property in accordance with law.

In plain English

Every religious denomination may set up and run religious and charitable institutions, manage its own religious affairs, and own and administer property in accordance with law, subject to public order, morality and health.

Judgments The Sabarimala case (2018)

#article-26

Article 28 Freedom as to attendance at religious instruction or religious worship in certain educational institutions

(1) No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State funds.

(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall apply to an educational institution which is administered by the State but has been established under any endowment or trust which requires that religious instruction shall be imparted in such institution.

(3) No person attending any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving aid out of State funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is a minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto.

In plain English

No religious instruction may be given in an institution wholly funded by the State. In an institution recognised or aided by the State, no one can be made to attend religious instruction or worship without their (or, for a minor, their guardian’s) consent.

#article-28

Part III

Fundamental rights: culture, education and remedies

The rights of minorities, and the right that makes every other right enforceable.

Article 29 Protection of interests of minorities

(1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.

(2) No citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them.

In plain English

Any section of citizens with a distinct language, script or culture has the right to conserve it. No citizen can be refused admission to a State-run or State-aided institution only on religion, race, caste or language.

Judgments The Communal G.O. case (1951)

#article-29

Article 30 Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions

(1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.

1[(1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority, referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause.]

(2) The State shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.

2* * * *

31. [Compulsory acquisition of property.].—Omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

2[Saving of Certain Laws]

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 4 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  2. Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 3 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).

In plain English

Religious and linguistic minorities have the right to set up and run educational institutions of their choice. The State cannot discriminate against them in giving aid. Minority status is judged State by State.

Judgments The private education case (2002)

#article-30

Article 32 Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part

(1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.

(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.

(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause (2).

(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

In plain English

The right to go straight to the Supreme Court to enforce a fundamental right is itself a fundamental right. The Court can issue writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any other order. B.R. Ambedkar called it the “heart and soul” of the Constitution. It can be suspended only as the Constitution itself provides (during an emergency, under Article 359).

Judgments The compensation case (1983) · The tribunals case (1997)

#article-32

Part IV

Directive Principles of State Policy

Goals the State must pursue in making laws. No court can enforce them, but courts use them to read rights more widely.

Article 36 Definition

In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires, “the State” has the same meaning as in Part III.

In plain English

“The State” in Part IV means the same as in Part III.

#article-36

Article 37 Application of the principles contained in this Part

The provisions contained in this Part shall not be enforceable by any court, but the principles therein laid down are nevertheless fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws.

In plain English

Directive Principles cannot be enforced by any court, yet they are fundamental to governance and the State must apply them in making laws. Courts have increasingly read fundamental rights in their light, and Minerva Mills held that Parts III and IV must be kept in balance.

Judgments The Communal G.O. case (1951) · The Minerva Mills case (1980)

#article-37

Article 38 State to secure a social order for the promotion of welfare of the people

1[(1)] The State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the national life.

2[(2) The State shall, in particular, strive to minimise the inequalities in income, and endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status, facilities and opportunities, not only amongst individuals but also amongst groups of people residing in different areas or engaged in different vocations.]

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. Art. 38 renumbered as cl. (1) by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 9 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  2. Ins. by s. 9, ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978] (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

In plain English

The State must work for a social order in which social, economic and political justice runs through all institutions, and must try to reduce inequalities of income, status, facilities and opportunity between individuals and between groups and regions.

#article-38

Article 39 Certain principles of policy to be followed by the State

The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing—

(a) that the citizens, men and women equally, have the right to an adequate means of livelihood;

(b) that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good;

(c) that the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment;

(d) that there is equal pay for equal work for both men and women;

(e) that the health and strength of workers, men and women, and the tender age of children are not abused and that citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter avocations unsuited to their age or strength;

1[(f) that children are given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity and that childhood and youth are protected against exploitation and against moral and material abandonment.]

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 7, for cl. (f) (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).

In plain English

Specific goals: an adequate livelihood for men and women equally; distribution of the community’s material resources for the common good; no harmful concentration of wealth; equal pay for equal work; protection of workers and children from abuse; and healthy development of children. Clauses (b) and (c) have been at the centre of debates on nationalisation and redistribution.

Judgments The Minerva Mills case (1980)

#article-39

Article 39A 1[Equal justice and free legal aid

The State shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular, provide free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities.]

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Ins. by s. 8, ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976] (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).

In plain English

The legal system must promote justice on the basis of equal opportunity, and the State must provide free legal aid so that no one is denied justice because of poverty or disability. The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gives effect to it.

Judgments The undertrials case (1979)

#article-39a

Article 40 Organisation of village panchayats

The State shall take steps to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government.

In plain English

The State must organise village panchayats and give them the powers they need to function as units of self-government. The Seventy-third Amendment (1992) later gave panchayats a constitutional framework in Part IX.

#article-40

Article 41 Right to work, to education and to public assistance in certain cases

The State shall, within the limits of its economic capacity and development, make effective provision for securing the right to work, to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement, and in other cases of undeserved want.

In plain English

Within its economic capacity, the State must secure the right to work, to education, and to public assistance in unemployment, old age, sickness, disablement and other undeserved want.

#article-41

Article 44 Uniform civil code for the citizens

The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.

In plain English

The State must try to secure a uniform civil code for citizens throughout India, that is, one set of family laws on marriage, divorce, succession and the like for all communities. It has been cited by the Supreme Court in several cases on personal law.

Judgments The Shah Bano case (1985) · The conversion-for-bigamy case (1995)

#article-44

Article 45 1[Provision for early childhood care and education to children below the age of six years

The State shall endeavour to provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years.]

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002, s. 3, for art. 45 (w.e.f. 1-4-2010).

In plain English

The State must try to provide early childhood care and education for all children until they turn six. (Before 2002 this article dealt with education up to fourteen; that became the fundamental right in Article 21A.)

#article-45

Article 46 Promotion of educational and economic interests of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other weaker sections

The State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, and, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation.

In plain English

The State must promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections, especially the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and protect them from social injustice and exploitation.

#article-46

Article 47 Duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living and to improve public health

The State shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties and, in particular, the State shall endeavour to bring about prohibition of the consumption except for medicinal purposes of intoxicating drinks and of drugs which are injurious to health.

In plain English

Raising nutrition, the standard of living and public health are among the State’s primary duties, and it must try to bring about prohibition of intoxicating drinks and harmful drugs, except for medicinal use.

#article-47

Article 48A 1[Protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wild life

The State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country.]

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 10 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).

In plain English

The State must try to protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests and wildlife. It was added in 1976, together with the citizen’s duty in Article 51A(g).

Judgments The oleum gas leak case (1986) · The Span Motel case (1996)

#article-48a

Article 50 Separation of judiciary from executive

The State shall take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the State.

In plain English

The State must separate the judiciary from the executive in its public services. For example, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 took judicial work away from executive magistrates.

#article-50

Article 51 Promotion of international peace and security

The State shall endeavour to—

(a) promote international peace and security; (b) maintain just and honourable relations between nations;

(c) foster respect for international law and treaty obligations in the dealings of organised peoples with one another; and

(d) encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration.

In plain English

The State must try to promote international peace and security, keep just and honourable relations between nations, respect international law and treaties, and encourage the settlement of international disputes by arbitration.

Judgments The workplace harassment case (1997)

#article-51

Part IVA

Fundamental duties

Duties of every citizen, added in 1976. No court can enforce them directly.

Article 51A Fundamental duties

It shall be the duty of every citizen of India—

(a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;

(b) to cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom;

(c) to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India;

(d) to defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so;

(e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women;

(f) to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture;

(g) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures;

(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence; (j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement; ] 1[(k) who is a parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education to his child or, as the case may be, ward between the age of six and fourteen years.]

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Ins. by the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002, s. 4 (w.e.f. 1-4-2010).

In plain English

Eleven duties of every citizen, among them to respect the Constitution, the flag and the anthem; uphold the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India; promote harmony and renounce practices derogatory to women; protect the environment; develop a scientific temper; and safeguard public property. Part IVA was added by the Forty-second Amendment (1976), on the recommendation of the Swaran Singh Committee; the eleventh duty, on parents and guardians to educate children aged six to fourteen, was added in 2002.

#article-51a

Part V

The Union executive

The President, the Council of Ministers and the Attorney General.

Article 52 The President of India

There shall be a President of India.

In plain English

There must always be a President of India, the head of the Union. The President is elected indirectly, by the elected members of both Houses of Parliament and of the State Legislative Assemblies (Article 54).

#article-52

Article 53 Executive power of the Union

(1) The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution. (2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union shall be vested in the President and the exercise thereof shall be regulated by law. (3) Nothing in this article shall—

(a) be deemed to transfer to the President any functions conferred by any existing law on the Government of any State or other authority; or

(b) prevent Parliament from conferring by law functions on authorities other than the President.

In plain English

The executive power of the Union is vested in the President, who exercises it directly or through subordinate officers, and is the supreme commander of the defence forces. In practice the President acts on the advice of the Council of Ministers (Article 74).

#article-53

Article 61 Procedure for impeachment of the President

(1) When a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either House of Parliament.

(2) No such charge shall be preferred unless—

(a) the proposal to prefer such charge is contained in a resolution which has been moved after at least fourteen days' notice in writing signed by not less than one-fourth of the total number of members of the House has been given of their intention to move the resolution, and

(b) such resolution has been passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House.

(3) When a charge has been so preferred by either House of Parliament, the other House shall investigate the charge or cause the charge to be investigated and the President shall have the right to appear and to be represented at such investigation.

(4) If as a result of the investigation a resolution is passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House by which the charge was investigated or caused to be investigated, declaring that the charge preferred against the President has been sustained, such resolution shall have the effect of removing the President from his office as from the date on which the resolution is so passed.

In plain English

The President can be impeached only for “violation of the Constitution”. Either House may bring the charge, with at least fourteen days’ notice signed by a quarter of its members, and a resolution passed by two-thirds of its total membership; the other House then investigates, and if it too passes the resolution by two-thirds, the President is removed.

#article-61

Article 72 Power of President to grant pardons, etc., and to suspend, remit or commute sentences in certain cases

(1) The President shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence—

(a) in all cases where the punishment or sentence is by a Court Martial;

(b) in all cases where the punishment or sentence is for an offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends;

(c) in all cases where the sentence is a sentence of death.

(2) Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the power conferred by law on any officer of the Armed Forces of the Union to suspend, remit or commute a sentence passed by a Court Martial.

(3) Nothing in sub-clause (c) of clause (1) shall affect the power to suspend, remit or commute a sentence of death exercisable by the Governor 1*** of a State under any law for the time being in force.

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. The words "or Rajpramukh" omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

The President can grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions, or suspend, remit or commute sentences, including death sentences and sentences by courts martial. The power is exercised on the advice of the Council of Ministers, and courts can review it on limited grounds such as arbitrariness or irrelevant considerations.

#article-72

Article 74 Council of Ministers to aid and advise President

1[(1) There shall be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid and advise the President who shall, in the exercise of his functions, act in accordance with such advice:]

2[Provided that the President may require the Council of Ministers to reconsider such advice, either generally or otherwise, and the President shall act in accordance with the advice tendered after such reconsideration.]

(2) The question whether any, and if so what, advice was tendered by Ministers to the President shall not be inquired into in any court.

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s.13, for cl. (1) (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).
  2. Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 11 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

In plain English

A Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister aids and advises the President, who must act on that advice (since 1976), though the President may once ask the Council to reconsider. No court can inquire into what advice was given.

#article-74

Article 75 Other provisions as to Ministers

(1) The Prime Minister shall be appointed by the President and the other Ministers shall be appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister.

1[(1A) The total number of Ministers, including the Prime Minister, in the Council of Ministers shall not exceed fifteen per cent. of the total number of members of the House of the People.

(1B) A member of either House of Parliament belonging to any political party who is disqualified for being a member of that House under paragraph 2 of the Tenth Schedule shall also be disqualified to be appointed as a Minister under clause (1) for duration of the period commencing from the date of his disqualification till the date on which the term of his office as such member would expire or where he contests any election to either House of Parliament before the expiry of such period, till the date on which he is declared elected, whichever is earlier.]

(2) The Ministers shall hold office during the pleasure of the President.

(3) The Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the House of the People.

(4) Before a Minister enters upon his office, the President shall administer to him the oaths of office and of secrecy according to the forms set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.

(5) A Minister who for any period of six consecutive months is not a member of either House of Parliament shall at the expiration of that period cease to be a Minister.

(6) The salaries and allowances of Ministers shall be such as Parliament may from time to time by law determine and, until Parliament so determines, shall be as specified in the Second Schedule.

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Ins. by the Constitution (Ninety-first Amendment) Act, 2003, s. 2 (w.e.f. 1-1-2004).

In plain English

The President appoints the Prime Minister and, on the Prime Minister’s advice, the other ministers. The Council of Ministers cannot exceed fifteen per cent of the Lok Sabha’s strength, and is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha. A minister who is not a member of Parliament must become one within six months.

#article-75

Article 76 Attorney-General for India

(1) The President shall appoint a person who is qualified to be appointed a Judge of the Supreme Court to be Attorney-General for India.

(2) It shall be the duty of the Attorney-General to give advice to the Government of India upon such legal matters, and to perform such other duties of a legal character, as may from time to time be referred or assigned to him by the President, and to discharge the functions conferred on him by or under this Constitution or any other law for the time being in force.

(3) In the performance of his duties the Attorney-General shall have right of audience in all courts in the territory of India.

(4) The Attorney-General shall hold office during the pleasure of the President, and shall receive such remuneration as the President may determine.

In plain English

The President appoints an Attorney General for India, who must be qualified to be a Supreme Court judge, gives the Government legal advice, has the right to be heard in every court in India, and holds office during the President’s pleasure.

#article-76

Part V

Parliament

How Parliament is made up, what protects its members, and how Bills become law.

Article 79 Constitution of Parliament

There shall be a Parliament for the Union which shall consist of the President and two Houses to be known respectively as the Council of States and the House of the People.

In plain English

Parliament consists of the President and two Houses: the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) and the House of the People (Lok Sabha).

#article-79

Article 105 Powers, privileges, etc., of the Houses of Parliament and of the members and committees thereof

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution and to the rules and standing orders regulating the procedure of Parliament, there shall be freedom of speech in Parliament.

(2) No member of Parliament shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in Parliament or any committee thereof, and no person shall be so liable in respect of the publication by or under the authority of either House of Parliament of any report, paper, votes or proceedings.

1[(3) In other respects, the powers, privileges and immunities of each House of Parliament, and of the members and the committees of each House, shall be such as may from time to time be defined by Parliament by law, and, until so defined, 2[shall be those of that House and of its members and committees immediately before the coming into force of section 15 of the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978.]].

(4) The provisions of clauses (1), (2) and (3) shall apply in relation to persons who by virtue of this Constitution have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, a House of Parliament or any committee thereof as they apply in relation to members of Parliament.

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 21 (date to be notified). This amendment was omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 45 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  2. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 15, for certain words (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

In plain English

Members of Parliament have freedom of speech in Parliament and cannot be taken to court for anything they say or any vote they give there. In 2024 the Supreme Court held that this immunity does not cover a member who takes a bribe to speak or vote.

Judgments The legislators’ bribery case (2024)

#article-105

Article 108 Joint sitting of both Houses in certain cases

(1) If after a Bill has been passed by one House and transmitted to the other House—

(a) the Bill is rejected by the other House; or

(b) the Houses have finally disagreed as to the amendments to be made in the Bill; or

(c) more than six months elapse from the date of the reception of the Bill by the other House without the Bill being passed by it,

the President may, unless the Bill has elapsed by reason of a dissolution of the House of the People, notify to the Houses by message if they are sitting or by public notification if they are not sitting, his intention to summon them to meet in a joint sitting for the purpose of deliberating and voting on the Bill:

Provided that nothing in this clause shall apply to a Money Bill.

(2) In reckoning any such period of six months as is referred to in clause (1), no account shall be taken of any period during which the House referred to in sub-clause (c) of that clause is prorogued or adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

(3) Where the President has under clause (1) notified his intention of summoning the Houses to meet in a joint sitting, neither House shall proceed further with the Bill, but the President may at any time after the date of his notification summon the Houses to meet in a joint sitting for the purpose specified in the notification and, if he does so, the Houses shall meet accordingly.

(4) If at the joint sitting of the two Houses the Bill, with such amendments, if any, as are agreed to in joint sitting, is passed by a majority of the total number of members of both Houses present and voting, it shall be deemed for the purposes of this Constitution to have been passed by both Houses:

Provided that at a joint sitting—

(a) if the Bill, having been passed by one House, has not been passed by the other House with amendments and returned to the House in which it originated, no amendment shall be proposed to the Bill other than such amendments (if any) as are made necessary by the delay in the passage of the Bill;

(b) if the Bill has been so passed and returned, only such amendments as aforesaid shall be proposed to the Bill and such other amendments as are relevant to the matters with respect to which the Houses have not agreed,

and the decision of the person presiding as to the amendments which are admissible under this clause shall be final.

(5) A joint sitting may be held under this article and a Bill passed thereat, notwithstanding that a dissolution of the House of the People has intervened since the President notified his intention to summon the Houses to meet therein.

In plain English

If the two Houses disagree on an ordinary Bill (or one House sits on it for six months), the President may call a joint sitting, where a majority of members present and voting decides. There can be no joint sitting on a Money Bill or a constitutional amendment.

#article-108

Article 110 Definition of “Money Bills”

(1) For the purposes of this Chapter, a Bill shall be deemed to be a Money Bill if it contains only provisions dealing with all or any of the following matters, namely:—

(a) the imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax;

(b) the regulation of the borrowing of money or the giving of any

guarantee by the Government of India, or the amendment of the law with respect to any financial obligations undertaken or to be undertaken by

the Government of India;

(c) the custody of the Consolidated Fund or the Contingency Fund of

India, the payment of moneys into or the withdrawal of moneys from any

such Fund;

(d) the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India;

(e) the declaring of any expenditure to be expenditure charged on the

Consolidated Fund of India or the increasing of the amount of any such

expenditure;

(f) the receipt of money on account of the Consolidated Fund of India or the public account of India or the custody or issue of such money or the audit of the accounts of the Union or of a State; or

(g) any matter incidental to any of the matters specified in sub-clauses (a) to (f).

(2) A Bill shall not be deemed to be a Money Bill by reason only that it provides for the imposition of fines or other pecuniary penalties, or for the demand or payment of fees for licences or fees for services rendered, or by reason that it provides for the imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax by any local authority or body for local purposes.

(3) If any question arises whether a Bill is a Money Bill or not, the decision of the Speaker of the House of the People thereon shall be final.

(4) There shall be endorsed on every Money Bill when it is transmitted to the Council of States under article 109, and when it is presented to the President for assent under article 111, the certificate of the Speaker of the House of the People signed by him that it is a Money Bill.

In plain English

Defines a Money Bill: one that deals only with matters such as taxes, government borrowing, the Consolidated Fund and expenditure charged on it. The Speaker’s decision that a Bill is a Money Bill is final, and the Rajya Sabha can only recommend changes to it.

Judgments The Aadhaar case (2018)

#article-110

Article 112 Annual financial statement

(1) The President shall in respect of every financial year cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament a statement of the estimated receipts and expenditure of the Government of India for that year, in this Part referred to as the "annual financial statement''.

(2) The estimates of expenditure embodied in the annual financial statement shall show separately—

(a) the sums required to meet expenditure described by this Constitution as expenditure charged upon the Consolidated Fund of

India; and

(b) the sums required to meet other expenditure proposed to be

made from the Consolidated Fund of India,

and shall distinguish expenditure on revenue account from other expenditure.

(3) The following expenditure shall be expenditure charged on the Consolidated Fund of India—

(a) the emoluments and allowances of the President and other expenditure relating to his office;

(b) the salaries and allowances of the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States and the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the House of the People;

(c) debt charges for which the Government of India is liable including interest, sinking fund charges and redemption charges, and other expenditure relating to the raising of loans and the service and redemption of debt;

(d) (i) the salaries, allowances and pensions payable to or in respect of Judges of the Supreme Court;

(ii) the pensions payable to or in respect of Judges of the Federal Court;

(iii) the pensions payable to or in respect of Judges of any High Court which exercises jurisdiction in relation to any area included in the territory of India or which at any time before the commencement of this Constitution exercised jurisdiction in relation to any area included in 1[a Governor's Province of the Dominion of India];

(e) the salary, allowances and pension payable to or in respect of the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India;

(f) any sums required to satisfy any judgment, decree or award of any court or arbitral tribunal;

(g) any other expenditure declared by this Constitution or by Parliament by law to be so charged.

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch., for "a Province corresponding to a State specified in Part A of the First Schedule" (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

Every financial year the President must have the “annual financial statement”, the Union Budget, laid before both Houses, showing estimated receipts and expenditure.

#article-112

Article 123 Power of President to promulgate Ordinances during recess of Parliament

(1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require.

(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament, but every such Ordinance—

(a) shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of Parliament, or, if before the expiration of that period resolutions disapproving it are passed by both Houses, upon the passing of the second of those resolutions; and

(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the President.

Explanation.—Where the Houses of Parliament are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.

(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which Parliament would not under this Constitution be competent to enact, it shall be void.

1(4)* * * * *

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Ins. by the Constitution (Thirty-eighth Amendment) Act, 1975, s. 2 (with retrospective effect) and omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 16 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

In plain English

When Parliament is not in session, the President can promulgate an ordinance, which has the force of a law of Parliament. It must be laid before Parliament when it reassembles and lapses six weeks later unless approved. The Supreme Court has held that re-promulgating ordinances again and again is a fraud on the Constitution (Krishna Kumar Singh, 2017).

#article-123

Part V

The Supreme Court

Its composition, its powers, and the reach of its orders.

Article 124 Establishment and constitution of the Supreme Court

(1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than 1[seven] other Judges.

(2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal 2[on the recommendation of the National Judicial Appointments Commission referred to in article 124A] and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years:

3[* * * * *]

4[Provided that]—

(a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;

(b) a Judge may be removed from his office in the manner provided in clause (4).

5[(2A) The age of a Judge of the Supreme Court shall be determined by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law provide.]

(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court unless he is a citizen of India and—

(a) has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or

(b) has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or

(c) is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist.

Explanation I.—In this clause "High Court'' means a High Court which exercises, or which at any time before the commencement of this Constitution exercised, jurisdiction in any part of the territory of India.

Explanation II.—In computing for the purpose of this clause the period during which a person has been an advocate, any period during which a person has held judicial office not inferior to that of a district judge after he became an advocate shall be included.

(4) A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.

(5) Parliament may by law regulate the procedure for the presentation of an address and for the investigation and proof of the misbehaviour or incapacity of a Judge under clause (4).

(6) Every person appointed to be a Judge of the Supreme Court shall, before he enters upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.

(7) No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.

Notes in the official text (5)
  1. Now “thirty-three” vide the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Act, 2019 (37 of 2019), s. 2 (w.e.f. 9-8-2019).
  2. Subs. by the Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014, s. 2, for "after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Court in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose" (w.e.f. 13-4-2015). This amendment has been struck down by the Supreme Court in the case of Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and another Vs. Union of India in its judgment dated 16-10-2015, AIR 2016 SC 117.
  3. The first proviso was omitted by s. 2, ibid. [the Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014] The proviso was as under:— "Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted:" This amendment has been struck down by the Supreme Court in the case of Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and another Vs. Union of India in its judgment dated 16-10-2015, AIR 2016 SC 117.
  4. Subs. by s. 2, ibid. [the Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014] for "provided further that" This amendment has been struck down by the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and another Vs Union of India judgment dated 16-10-2015, AIR 2016 SC 117.
  5. Ins. by the Constitution (Fifteenth Amendment) Act, 1963, s. 2 (w.e.f. 5-10-1963).

In plain English

Sets up the Supreme Court: the Chief Justice and other judges (Parliament has raised the number to thirty-three plus the Chief Justice). Judges serve until sixty-five and can be removed only by an order of the President after each House passes an address by a special majority on proved misbehaviour or incapacity. Note: the official text prints the words inserted by the Ninety-ninth Amendment (appointment on the recommendation of the NJAC), but the Supreme Court struck that amendment down in 2015, so judges are appointed through the collegium.

Judgments The First Judges case (1981) · The Second Judges case (1993) · The NJAC case (Fourth Judges case) (2015)

#article-124

Article 129 Supreme Court to be a court of record

The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

In plain English

The Supreme Court is a court of record, with power to punish for contempt of itself. Its judgments are kept as permanent records and are evidence of what was decided.

#article-129

Article 131 Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Supreme Court shall, to the exclusion of any other court, have original jurisdiction in any dispute—

(a) between the Government of India and one or more States; or

(b) between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more other States on the other; or

(c) between two or more States,

if and in so far as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends:

1[Provided that the said jurisdiction shall not extend to a dispute arising out of any treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, sanad or other similar instrument which, having been entered into or executed before the commencement of this Constitution, continues in operation after such commencement, or which provides that the said jurisdiction shall not extend to such a dispute.]

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 5, for the proviso (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

Only the Supreme Court can hear a dispute between the Government of India and one or more States, or between States, where a legal right is involved. This is its original jurisdiction.

#article-131

Article 136 Special leave to appeal by the Supreme Court

(1) Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Supreme Court may, in its discretion, grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order in any cause or matter passed or made by any court or tribunal in the territory of India.

(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall apply to any judgment, determination, sentence or order passed or made by any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the Armed Forces.

In plain English

The Supreme Court may grant special leave to appeal from any judgment or order of any court or tribunal in India (except military tribunals). It is a discretionary power, used for substantial questions of law or grave injustice.

#article-136

Article 141 Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts

The law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within

the territory of India.

In plain English

The law declared by the Supreme Court binds all courts in India. This is why its judgments matter so much: a ruling on what the law means becomes the law everywhere.

#article-141

Article 142 Enforcement of decrees and orders of the Supreme Court and orders as to discovery, etc

(1) The Supreme Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction may pass such decree or make such order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it, and any decree so passed or order so made shall be enforceable throughout the territory of India in such manner as may be prescribed by or under any law made by Parliament and, until provision in that behalf is so made, in such manner as the President may by order1 prescribe.

(2) Subject to the provisions of any law made in this behalf by Parliament, the Supreme Court shall, as respects the whole of the territory of India, have all and every power to make any order for the purpose of securing the attendance of any person, the discovery or production of any documents, or the investigation or punishment of any contempt of itself.

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. See the Supreme Court (Decrees and Orders) Enforcement Order, 1954 (C.O. 47).

In plain English

The Supreme Court can pass any decree or order necessary to do “complete justice” in a case before it. It has used this power, for example, to dissolve marriages that have irretrievably broken down and to issue guidelines where no law exists.

Judgments The workplace harassment case (1997) · The Ayodhya case (2019)

#article-142

Article 143 Power of the President to consult the Supreme Court

(1) If at any time it appears to the President that a question of law or fact has arisen, or is likely to arise, which is of such a nature and of such public importance that it is expedient to obtain the opinion of the Supreme Court upon it, he may refer the question to that Court for consideration and the Court may, after such hearing as it thinks fit, report to the President its opinion thereon.

(2) The President may, notwithstanding anything in 1*** the proviso to article 131, refer a dispute of the kind mentioned in the 2[said proviso] to the Supreme Court for opinion and the Supreme Court shall, after such hearing as it thinks fit, report to the President its opinion thereon.

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. The words, brackets and figure "clause (i) of" omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
  2. Subs. by s. 29 and Sch., ibid. [the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956], for "said clause" (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

The President can refer a question of law or fact of public importance to the Supreme Court for its opinion. The Court may give its advice; it is an advisory, not a binding, jurisdiction.

Judgments The Berubari reference (1960)

#article-143

Part VI

The States and the High Courts

Governors, State ministers, State Bills and the High Courts’ writ power.

Article 153 Governors of States

There shall be a Governor for each State: 1[Provided that nothing in this article shall prevent the appointment of the same person as Governor for two or more States.]

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Added by s. 6, ibid. [the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956] (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

There shall be a Governor for each State; one person may be Governor of two or more States.

#article-153

Article 163 Council of Ministers to aid and advise Governor

(1) There shall be a Council of Ministers with the Chief Minister at the head to aid and advise the Governor in the exercise of his functions, except in so far as he is by or under this Constitution required to exercise his functions or any of them in his discretion.

(2) If any question arises whether any matter is or is not a matter as respects which the Governor is by or under this Constitution required to act in his discretion, the decision of the Governor in his discretion shall be final, and the validity of anything done by the Governor shall not be called in question on the ground that he ought or ought not to have acted in his discretion.

(3) The question whether any, and if so what, advice was tendered by Ministers to the Governor shall not be inquired into in any court.

In plain English

A Council of Ministers headed by the Chief Minister aids and advises the Governor, except where the Constitution requires the Governor to act in their discretion. If a question arises whether a matter is within the Governor’s discretion, the Governor’s decision is final.

Judgments The President’s Rule case (1994)

#article-163

Article 164 Other provisions as to Ministers

(1) The Chief Minister shall be appointed by the Governor and the other Ministers shall be appointed by the Governor on the advice of the Chief Minister, and the Ministers shall hold office during the pleasure of the Governor:

Provided that in the States of 1[Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand], Madhya Pradesh and 2[Odisha] there shall be a Minister in charge of tribal welfare who may in addition be in charge of the welfare of the Scheduled Castes and backward classes or any other work.

3[(1A) The total number of Ministers, including the Chief Minister, in the Council of Ministers in a State shall not exceed fifteen per cent. of the total number of members of the Legislative Assembly of that State:

Provided that the number of Ministers, including the Chief Minister in a State shall not be less than twelve:

Provided further that where the total number of Ministers including the Chief Minister in the Council of Ministers in any State at the commencement of the Constitution (Ninety-first Amendment) Act, 2003 exceeds the said fifteen per cent. or the number specified in the first proviso, as the case may be, then the total number of Ministers in that State shall be brought in conformity with the provisions of this clause within six months from such date4 as the President may by public notification appoint.

(1B) A member of the Legislative Assembly of a State or either House of the Legislature of a State having Legislative Council belonging to any political party who is disqualified for being a member of that House under paragraph 2 of the Tenth Schedule shall also be disqualified to be appointed as a Minister under clause (1) for duration of the period commencing from the date of his disqualification till the date on which the term of his office as such member would expire or where he contests any election to the Legislative Assembly of a State or either House of the Legislature of a State having Legislative Council, as the case may be, before the expiry of such period, till the date on which he is declared elected, whichever is earlier.]

(2) The Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the Legislative Assembly of the State.

(3) Before a Minister enters upon his office, the Governor shall administer to him the oaths of office and of secrecy according to the forms set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.

(4) A Minister who for any period of six consecutive months is not a member of the Legislature of the State shall at the expiration of that period cease to be a Minister.

(5) The salaries and allowances of Ministers shall be such as the Legislature of the State may from time to time by law determine and, until the Legislature of the State so determines, shall be as specified in the Second Schedule.

Notes in the official text (4)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Ninety-fourth Amendment) Act, 2006, s. 2, for "Bihar" (w.e.f. 12-6-2006).
  2. Subs. by the Orissa (Alteration of Name) Act, 2011 (15 of 2011), s. 4, for "Orissa" (w.e.f. 1-11-2011).
  3. Ins. by the Constitution (Ninety-first Amendment) Act, 2003, s. 3 (w.e.f. 1-1-2004).
  4. 7-1-2004, vide notification number S.O. 21(E), dated 7-1-2004.

In plain English

The Governor appoints the Chief Minister and, on the Chief Minister’s advice, the other ministers, who hold office during the Governor’s pleasure but are collectively responsible to the State Legislative Assembly. The Council cannot exceed fifteen per cent of the Assembly’s strength (with a minimum of twelve).

#article-164

Article 200 Assent to Bills

When a Bill has been passed by the Legislative Assembly of a State or, in the case of a State having a Legislative Council, has been passed by both Houses of the Legislature of the State, it shall be presented to the Governor and the Governor shall declare either that he assents to the Bill or that he withholds assent therefrom or that he reserves the Bill for the consideration of the President:

Provided that the Governor may, as soon as possible after the presentation to him of the Bill for assent, return the Bill if it is not a Money Bill together with a message requesting that the House or Houses will reconsider the Bill or any specified provisions thereof and, in particular, will consider the desirability of introducing any such amendments as he may recommend in his message and, when a Bill is so returned, the House or Houses shall reconsider the Bill accordingly, and if the Bill is passed again by the House or Houses with or without amendment and presented to the Governor for assent, the Governor shall not withhold assent therefrom:

Provided further that the Governor shall not assent to, but shall reserve for the consideration of the President, any Bill which in the opinion of the Governor would, if it became law, so derogate from the powers of the High Court as to endanger the position which that Court is by this Constitution designed to fill.

In plain English

When a State Bill is presented, the Governor may assent, withhold assent, return it (if it is not a Money Bill) for reconsideration, or reserve it for the President. If the Legislature passes it again, the Governor cannot withhold assent. In State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to the Governor (2023), the Supreme Court held that a Governor cannot keep a Bill pending indefinitely.

#article-200

Article 213 Power of Governor to promulgate Ordinances during recess of Legislature

(1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when both Houses of the Legislature are in session, the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require:

Provided that the Governor shall not, without instructions from the President, promulgate any such Ordinance if—

(a) a Bill containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have required the previous sanction of the President for the introduction thereof into the Legislature; or

(b) he would have deemed it necessary to reserve a Bill containing the same provisions for the consideration of the President; or

(c) an Act of the Legislature of the State containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have been invalid unless, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, it had received the assent of the President. (2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, but every such Ordinance—

(a) shall be laid before the Legislative Assembly of the State, or where there is a Legislative Council in the State, before both the Houses, and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of the Legislature, or if before the expiration of that period a resolution disapproving it is passed by the Legislative Assembly and agreed to by the Legislative Council, if any, upon the passing of the resolution or, as the case may be, on the resolution being agreed to by the Council; and

(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the Governor.

Explanation.—Where the Houses of the Legislature of a State having a Legislative Council are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.

(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which would not be valid if enacted in an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, it shall be void:

Provided that, for the purposes of the provisions of this Constitution relating to the effect of an Act of the Legislature of a State which is repugnant to an Act of Parliament or an existing law with respect to a matter enumerated in the Concurrent List, an Ordinance promulgated under this article in pursuance of instructions from the President shall be deemed to be an Act of the Legislature of the State which has been reserved for the consideration of the President and assented to by him.

1(4)* * * *

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Cl. (4) was ins. by the Constitution (Thirty-eighth Amendment) Act, 1975, s. 3 (with retrospective effect) and omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 27 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

In plain English

The Governor can promulgate ordinances when the State Legislature is not in session, on the same lines as the President under Article 123.

#article-213

Article 214 High Courts for States

1*** There shall be a High Court for each State.

2(2)* * * *

2(3)* * * *

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. The bracket and figure "(1)" omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
  2. Cls. (2) and (3) omitted by s. 29 and Sch., ibid. [the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956] (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

Each State has a High Court. Under Article 231, Parliament may set up one common High Court for two or more States, or for a State and a Union territory, as with the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.

#article-214

Article 226 1[Power of High Courts to issue certain writs

(1) Notwithstanding anything in article 32 2***, every High Court shall have power, throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction, to issue to any person or authority, including in appropriate cases, any Government, within those territories directions, orders or writs, including 3[writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by Part III and for any other purpose.]

(2) The power conferred by clause (1) to issue directions, orders or writs to any Government, authority or person may also be exercised by any High Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to the territories within which the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises for the exercise of such power,

notwithstanding that the seat of such Government or authority or the residence of such person is not within those territories.

4[(3) Where any party against whom an interim order, whether by way of injunction or stay or in any other manner, is made on, or in any proceedings relating to, a petition under clause (1), without—

(a) furnishing to such party copies of such petition and all documents in support of the plea for such interim order; and

(b) giving such party an opportunity of being heard,

makes an application to the High Court for the vacation of such order and furnishes a copy of such application to the party in whose favour such order has been made or the counsel of such party, the High Court shall dispose of the application within a period of two weeks from the date on which it is received or from the date on which the copy of such application is so furnished, whichever is later, or where the High Court is closed on the last day of that period, before the expiry of the next day afterwards on which the High Court is open; and if the application is not so disposed of, the interim order shall, on the expiry of that period, or, as the case may be, the expiry of the said next day, stand vacated.]

5[(4) The power conferred on a High Court by this article shall not be in derogation of the power conferred on the Supreme Court by clause (2) of article 32.]

Notes in the official text (5)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 38 for art. 226 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
  2. The words, figures and letters "but subject to the provisions of article 131A and article 226A" omitted by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 7 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).
  3. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 30, for the portion beginning with "writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them" and ending with "such illegality has resulted in substantial failure of justice." (w.e.f. 1-8-1979).
  4. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s.30, for cls. (3), (4), (5) and (6) (w.e.f. 1-8-1979).
  5. Cl. (7) renumbered as cl. (4) by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 30 (w.e.f. 1-8-1979).

In plain English

Every High Court can issue writs, including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, to any person or authority within its territory, to enforce fundamental rights “and for any other purpose”. Its writ jurisdiction is therefore wider than the Supreme Court’s under Article 32, and it is part of the basic structure.

Judgments The tribunals case (1997)

#article-226

Article 227 Power of superintendence over all courts by the High Court

1[(1) Every High Court shall have superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction.]

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the High Court may—

(a) call for returns from such courts;

(b) make and issue general rules and prescribe forms for regulating the practice and proceedings of such courts; and

(c) prescribe forms in which books, entries and accounts shall be kept by the officers of any such courts.

(3) The High Court may also settle tables of fees to be allowed to the sheriff and all clerks and officers of such courts and to attorneys, advocates and pleaders practising therein:

Provided that any rules made, forms prescribed or tables settled under clause (2) or clause (3) shall not be inconsistent with the provision of any law for the time being in force, and shall require the previous approval of the Governor.

(4) Nothing in this article shall be deemed to confer on a High Court

powers of superintendence over any court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the Armed Forces.

2(5)* * * *

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 40, for cl. (1) (w.e.f. 1-2-1977) and further subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 31, for cl. (1) (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  2. Cl. (5) was ins. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 40 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977) and omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 31 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

In plain English

Every High Court supervises all courts and tribunals within its territory (except military tribunals), and can call for returns and regulate their practice.

Judgments The tribunals case (1997)

#article-227

Parts XI, XII and XIV

Laws, money and the services

Who may legislate on what, property, the Finance Commission and civil servants.

Article 245 Extent of laws made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Parliament may make laws for the whole or any part of the territory of India, and the Legislature of a State may make laws for the whole or any part of the State.

(2) No law made by Parliament shall be deemed to be invalid on the ground that it would have extra-territorial operation.

In plain English

Parliament may make laws for the whole or any part of India, including laws that operate beyond India’s territory; State Legislatures make laws for their own State.

#article-245

Article 246 Subject-matter of laws made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States

(1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Union List”).

(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause (3), Parliament, and, subject to clause (1), the Legislature of any State 1*** also, have power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List III in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Concurrent List”).

(3) Subject to clauses (1) and (2), the Legislature of any State 1*** has exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List II in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “State List”).

(4) Parliament has power to make laws with respect to any matter for any part of the territory of India not included 2[in a State] notwithstanding that such matter is a matter enumerated in the State List.

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. The words and letters "specified in Part A or Part B of the First Schedule" omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
  2. Subs. by s. 29 and Sch., ibid. [the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956], for "in Part A or Part B of the First Schedule" (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

Divides law-making power through the Seventh Schedule: Parliament alone on the Union List, States alone on the State List, and both on the Concurrent List, with Parliament’s law prevailing where they conflict on a concurrent matter.

#article-246

Article 248 Residuary powers of legislation

(1) 1[Subject to article 246A, Parliament] has exclusive power to make any law with respect to any matter not enumerated in the Concurrent List or State List.

(2) Such power shall include the power of making any law imposing a tax not mentioned in either of those Lists.

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, s. 3, for "Parliament" (w.e.f. 16-9-2016).

In plain English

Parliament alone may make laws on any matter not listed in the State or Concurrent Lists, including taxes not mentioned there. These are its residuary powers.

#article-248

Article 254 Inconsistency between laws made by Parliament and laws made by the Legislatures of States

(1) If any provision of a law made by the Legislature of a State is repugnant to any provision of a law made by Parliament which Parliament is competent to enact, or to any provision of an existing law with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List, then, subject to the provisions of clause (2), the law made by Parliament, whether passed before or after the law made by the Legislature of such State, or, as the case may be, the existing law, shall prevail and the law made by the Legislature of the State shall, to the extent of the repugnancy, be void.

(2) Where a law made by the Legislature of a State 1*** with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List contains any provision repugnant to the provisions of an earlier law made by Parliament or an existing law with respect to that matter, then, the law so made by the Legislature of such State shall, if it has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent, prevail in that State:

Provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent Parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the Legislature of the State.

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. The words and letters "specified in Part A or Part B of the First Schedule" omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

If a State law on a Concurrent List subject conflicts with a Parliamentary law, the Parliamentary law prevails, unless the State law was reserved for and received the President’s assent, in which case it prevails in that State (Parliament can still override it later).

#article-254

Article 265 Taxes not to be imposed save by authority of law

No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law.

In plain English

No tax can be levied or collected except by authority of law. The executive cannot impose a tax by an order.

#article-265

Article 280 Finance Commission

(1) The President shall, within two years from the commencement of this Constitution and thereafter at the expiration of every fifth year or at such earlier time as the President considers necessary, by order constitute a Finance Commission which shall consist of a Chairman and four other members to be appointed by the President.

(2) Parliament may by law determine the qualifications which shall be requisite for appointment as members of the Commission and the manner in which they shall be selected.

(3) It shall be the duty of the Commission to make recommendations to the President as to—

(a) the distribution between the Union and the States of the net proceeds of taxes which are to be, or may be, divided between them under this Chapter and the allocation between the States of the respective shares of such proceeds;

(b) the principles which should govern the grants-in-aid of the revenues of the States out of the Consolidated Fund of India;

1[(bb) the measures needed to augment the Consolidated Fund of a State to supplement the resources of the Panchayats in the State on the basis of the recommendations made by the Finance Commission of the State;]

2[(c) the measures needed to augment the Consolidated Fund of a State to supplement the resources of the Municipalities in the State on the basis of the recommendations made by the Finance Commission of the State;]

3[(d)] any other matter referred to the Commission by the President in the interests of sound finance.

(4) The Commission shall determine their procedure and shall have such powers in the performance of their functions as Parliament may by law confer on them.

Notes in the official text (3)
  1. Ins. by the Constitution (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992, s. 3 (w.e.f. 24-4-1993).
  2. Ins. by the Constitution (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992, s. 3 (w.e.f. 1-6-1993).
  3. Sub-clause (c) re-lettered as sub-clause (d) by s. 3, ibid. [the Constitution (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992] (w.e.f. 1-6-1993).

In plain English

The President appoints a Finance Commission every five years to recommend how tax revenue is to be shared between the Union and the States and among the States, and the principles for grants-in-aid.

#article-280

Article 300A Persons not to be deprived of property save by authority of law

No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.]

In plain English

No person can be deprived of property save by authority of law. Since the Forty-fourth Amendment (1978) removed the fundamental right to property, this is a constitutional (but not a fundamental) right: the State needs a valid law to take property, but there is no fundamental right to compensation.

Judgments The bank nationalisation case (1970)

#article-300a

Article 311 Dismissal, removal or reduction in rank of persons employed in civil capacities under the Union or a State

(1) No person who is a member of a civil service of the Union or an all-India service or a civil service of a State or holds a civil post under the Union or a State shall be dismissed or removed by an authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed.

1[(2) No such person as aforesaid shall be dismissed or removed or reduced in rank except after an inquiry in which he has been informed of the charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those charges 2***:

3[Provided that where it is proposed after such inquiry, to impose upon him any such penalty, such penalty may be imposed on the basis of the evidence adduced during such inquiry and it shall not be necessary to give such person any opportunity of making representation on the penalty proposed:

Provided further that this clause shall not apply—]

(a) where a person is dismissed or removed or reduced in rank on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction on a criminal charge; or

(b) where the authority empowered to dismiss or remove a person or to reduce him in rank is satisfied that for some reason, to be recorded by that authority in writing, it is not reasonably practicable to hold such inquiry; or

(c) where the President or the Governor, as the case may be, is satisfied that in the interest of the security of the State it is not expedient to hold such inquiry.

(3) If, in respect of any such person as aforesaid, a question arises whether it is reasonably practicable to hold such inquiry as is referred to in clause (2), the decision thereon of the authority empowered to dismiss or remove such person or to reduce him in rank shall be final.]

Notes in the official text (3)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Fifteenth Amendment) Act, 1963, s. 10, for cls. (2) and (3) (w.e.f. 5-10-1963).
  2. Certain words omitted by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 44 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).
  3. Subs. by s. 44, ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976], for certain words (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).

In plain English

A civil servant cannot be dismissed or removed by an authority lower than the one that appointed them, and cannot be dismissed, removed or reduced in rank without an inquiry in which they are told the charges and given a reasonable chance to be heard, except in the cases the article lists.

#article-311

Article 315 Public Service Commissions for the Union and for the States

(1) Subject to the provisions of this article, there shall be a Public Service Commission for the Union and a Public Service Commission for each State.

(2) Two or more States may agree that there shall be one Public Service Commission for that group of States, and if a resolution to that effect is passed by the House or, where there are two Houses, by each House of the Legislature of each of those States, Parliament may by law provide for the appointment of a Joint State Public Service Commission (referred to in this Chapter as Joint Commission) to serve the needs of those States.

(3) Any such law as aforesaid may contain such incidental and consequential provisions as may be necessary or desirable for giving effect to the purposes of the law.

(4) The Public Service Commission for the Union, if requested so to do by the Governor 1*** of a State, may, with the approval of the President, agree to serve all or any of the needs of the State.

(5) References in this Constitution to the Union Public Service Commission or a State Public Service Commission shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be construed as references to the Commission serving the needs of the Union or, as the case may be, the State as respects the particular matter in question.

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. The words "or Rajpramukh" omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

There shall be a Union Public Service Commission and a Public Service Commission for each State; two or more States may agree to share a Joint Commission.

#article-315

Part XV

Elections

The Election Commission and the right to vote.

Article 324 Superintendence, direction and control of elections to be vested in an Election Commission

(1) The superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of the electoral rolls for, and the conduct of, all elections to Parliament and to the Legislature of every State and of elections to the offices of President and Vice-President held under this Constitution 1*** shall be vested in a Commission (referred to in this Constitution as the Election Commission).

(2) The Election Commission shall consist of the Chief Election Commissioner and such number of other Election Commissioners, if any, as the President may from time to time fix and the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners shall, subject to the provisions of any law made in that behalf by Parliament, be made by the President.

(3) When any other Election Commissioner is so appointed the Chief Election Commissioner shall act as the Chairman of the Election Commission.

(4) Before each general election to the House of the People and to the Legislative Assembly of each State, and before the first general election and thereafter before each biennial election to the Legislative Council of each State having such Council, the President may also appoint after consultation with the Election Commission such Regional Commissioners as he may consider necessary to assist the Election Commission in the performance of the functions conferred on the Commission by clause (1).

(5) Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament, the conditions of service and tenure of office of the Election Commissioners and the Regional Commissioners shall be such as the President may by rule determine:

Provided that the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be removed from his office except in like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court and the conditions of service of the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment:

Provided further that any other Election Commissioner or a Regional Commissioner shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner.

(6) The President, or the Governor 2*** of a State, shall, when so requested by the Election Commission, make available to the Election Commission or to a Regional Commissioner such staff as may be necessary for the discharge of the functions conferred on the Election Commission by clause (1).

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. The words "including the appointment of election tribunals for the decision of doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with elections to Parliament and to the Legislatures of States" omitted by the Constitution (Nineteenth Amendment) Act, 1966, s. 2 (w.e.f. 11-12-1966).
  2. The words "or Rajpramukh" omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

In plain English

The superintendence, direction and control of elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, the President and the Vice-President are vested in the Election Commission. The Chief Election Commissioner can be removed only like a Supreme Court judge. Appointments are made by the President, subject to any law of Parliament; that law is now the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023.

Judgments The Election Commission appointments case (2023) · The candidate disclosure case (2002)

#article-324

Article 326 Elections to the House of the People and to the Legislative Assemblies of States to be on the basis of adult suffrage

The elections to the House of the People and to the Legislative Assembly of every State shall be on the basis of adult suffrage; that is to say, every person who is a citizen of India and who is not less than 1[eighteen years] of age on such date as may be fixed in that behalf by or under any law made by the appropriate Legislature and is not otherwise disqualified under this Constitution or any law made by the appropriate Legislature on the ground of non-residence, unsoundness of mind, crime or corrupt or illegal practice, shall be entitled to be registered as a voter at any such election.

Notes in the official text (1)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Sixty-first Amendment) Act, 1988, s. 2, for "twenty-one years" (w.e.f. 28-3-1989).

In plain English

Elections to the Lok Sabha and the State Assemblies are by adult suffrage: every citizen aged eighteen or over (lowered from twenty-one in 1989) who is not otherwise disqualified can vote.

Judgments The NOTA case (2013)

#article-326

Part XVIII

Emergency provisions

National emergency, President’s Rule and financial emergency, and what happens to rights.

Article 352 Proclamation of Emergency

(1) If the President is satisfied that a grave emergency exists whereby the security of India or of any part of the territory thereof is threatened, whether by war or external aggression or 1[armed rebellion], he may, by Proclamation, make a declaration to that effect 2[in respect of the whole of India or of such part of the territory thereof as may be specified in the Proclamation.]

3[Explanation.—A Proclamation of Emergency declaring that the security of India or any part of the territory thereof is threatened by war or by external aggression or by armed rebellion may be made before the actual occurrence of war or of any such aggression or rebellion, if the President is satisfied that there is imminent danger thereof.]

4[(2) A Proclamation issued under clause (1) may be varied or revoked by a subsequent Proclamation.

(3) The President shall not issue a Proclamation under clause (1) or a Proclamation varying such Proclamation unless the decision of the Union Cabinet (that is to say, the Council consisting of the Prime Minister and other Ministers of Cabinet rank appointed under article 75) that such a Proclamation may be issued has been communicated to him in writing.

(4) Every Proclamation issued under this article shall be laid before each House of Parliament and shall, except where it is a Proclamation revoking a previous Proclamation, cease to operate at the expiration of one month unless before the expiration of that period it has been approved by resolutions of both Houses of Parliament:

Provided that if any such Proclamation (not being a Proclamation revoking a previous Proclamation) is issued at a time when the House of the People has been dissolved, or the dissolution of the House of the People takes place during the period of one month referred to in this clause, and if a resolution approving the Proclamation has been passed by the Council of States, but no resolution with respect to such Proclamation has been passed by the House of the People before the expiration of that period, the Proclamation shall cease to operate at the expiration of thirty days from the date on which the House of the People first sits after its reconstitution, unless before the expiration of the said period of thirty days a resolution approving the Proclamation has been also passed by the House of the People.

(5) A Proclamation so approved shall, unless revoked, cease to operate on the expiration of a period of six months from the date of the passing of the second of the resolutions approving the Proclamation under clause (4):

Provided that if and so often as a resolution approving the continuance in force of such a Proclamation is passed by both Houses of Parliament the Proclamation shall, unless revoked, continue in force for a further period of six months from the date on which it would otherwise have ceased to operate under this clause:

Provided further that if the dissolution of the House of the People takes place during any such period of six months and a resolution approving the continuance in force of such Proclamation has been passed by the Council of States but no resolution with respect to the continuance in force of such Proclamation has been passed by the House of the People during the said period, the Proclamation shall cease to operate at the expiration of thirty days from the date on which the House of the People first sits after its reconstitution unless before the expiration of the said period of thirty days, a resolution approving the continuance in force of the Proclamation has been also passed by the House of the People.

(6) For the purposes of clauses (4) and (5), a resolution may be passed by either House of Parliament only by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the Members of that House present and voting.

(7) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing clauses, the President shall revoke a Proclamation issued under clause (1) or a Proclamation varying such Proclamation if the House of the People passes a resolution disapproving, or, as the case may be, disapproving the continuance in force of, such Proclamation.

(8) Where a notice in writing signed by not less than one-tenth of the total number of members of the House of the People has been given, of their intention to move a resolution for disapproving, or, as the case may be, for disapproving the continuance in force of, a Proclamation issued under clause (1) or a Proclamation varying such Proclamation,—

(a) to the Speaker, if the House is in session; or

(b) to the President, if the House is not in session,

a special sitting of the House shall be held within fourteen days from the date on which such notice is received by the Speaker, or, as the case may be, by the President, for the purpose of considering such resolution.]

5[(9) The power conferred on the President by this article shall include the power to issue different Proclamations on different grounds, being war or external aggression or 6[armed rebellion] or imminent danger of war or external aggression or 6[armed rebellion], whether or not there is a Proclamation already issued by the President under clause (1) and such Proclamation is in

operation.

5* * * * * * * *

Notes in the official text (6)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 37, for "internal disturbance" (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  2. Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 48 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).
  3. Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 37 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  4. Subs. by s. 37, ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978], for cls. (2), (2A) and (3) (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  5. Cls. (4) and (5) ins. by the Constitution (Thirty-eighth Amendment) Act, 1975, s. 5 (with retrospective effect) and subsequently cl. (4) renumbered as cl. (9) and cl. (5) omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 37 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  6. Subs. by s. 37, ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978] for "internal disturbance" (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

In plain English

The President may proclaim a national emergency if the security of India is threatened by war, external aggression or armed rebellion (“internal disturbance” was replaced by “armed rebellion” in 1978), but only on the written advice of the Union Cabinet. Each House must approve it within one month by a special majority, and it must be renewed every six months.

Judgments The habeas corpus case (1976) · The Minerva Mills case (1980)

#article-352

Article 356 Provisions in case of failure of constitutional machinery in States

(1) If the President, on receipt of a report from the Governor 1*** of a State or otherwise, is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the Government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution, the President may by Proclamation—

(a) assume to himself all or any of the functions of the Government of the State and all or any of the powers vested in or exercisable by the Governor 2*** or any body or authority in the State other than the Legislature of the State;

(b) declare that the powers of the Legislature of the State shall be exercisable by or under the authority of Parliament;

(c) make such incidental and consequential provisions as appear to the President to be necessary or desirable for giving effect to the objects of the Proclamation, including provisions for suspending in whole or in part the operation of any provisions of this Constitution relating to any body or authority in the State:

Provided that nothing in this clause shall authorise the President to assume to himself any of the powers vested in or exercisable by a High Court, or to suspend in whole or in part the operation of any provision of this Constitution relating to High Courts.

(2) Any such Proclamation may be revoked or varied by a subsequent Proclamation.

(3) Every Proclamation under this article shall be laid before each House of Parliament and shall, except where it is a Proclamation revoking a previous Proclamation, cease to operate at the expiration of two months unless before the expiration of that period it has been approved by resolutions of both Houses of Parliament:

Provided that if any such Proclamation (not being a Proclamation revoking a previous Proclamation) is issued at a time when the House of the People is dissolved or the dissolution of the House of the People takes place during the period of two months referred to in this clause, and if a resolution approving the Proclamation has been passed by the Council of States, but no resolution with respect to such Proclamation has been passed by the House of the People before the expiration of that period, the Proclamation shall cease to operate at the expiration of thirty days from the date on which the House of the People first sits after its reconstitution unless before the expiration of the said period of thirty days a resolution approving the Proclamation has been also passed by the House of the People.

(4) A Proclamation so approved shall, unless revoked, cease to operate on the expiration of a period of 3[six months from the date of issue of the Proclamation]:

Provided that if and so often as a resolution approving the continuance in force of such a Proclamation is passed by both Houses of Parliament, the Proclamation shall, unless revoked, continue in force for a further period of 4[six months] from the date on which under this clause it would otherwise have ceased to operate, but no such Proclamation shall in any case remain in force for more than three years:

Provided further that if the dissolution of the House of the People takes place during any such period of 4[six months] and a resolution approving the continuance in force of such Proclamation has been passed by the Council of States, but no resolution with respect to the continuance in force of such Proclamation has been passed by the House of the People during the said period, the Proclamation shall cease to operate at the expiration of thirty days from the date on which the House of the People first sits after its reconstitution unless before the expiration of the said period of thirty days a resolution approving the continuance in force of the Proclamation has been also passed by the House of the People:

5[Provided also that in the case of the Proclamation issued under clause (1) on the 11th day of May, 1987 with respect to the State of Punjab, the reference in the first proviso to this clause to “three years” shall be construed as a reference to 6[five years].]

7[(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (4), a resolution with respect to the continuance in force of a Proclamation approved under clause (3) for any period beyond the expiration of one year from the date of issue of such Proclamation shall not be passed by either House of Parliament unless—

(a) a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, in the whole of India or, as the case may be, in the whole or any part of the State, at the time of the passing of such resolution, and

(b) the Election Commission certifies that the continuance in force of the Proclamation approved under clause (3) during the period specified in such resolution is necessary on account of difficulties in holding general elections to the Legislative Assembly of the State concerned:] 8[Provided that nothing in this clause shall apply to the Proclamation issued under clause (1) on the 11th day of May, 1987 with respect to the State of Punjab.]

Notes in the official text (8)
  1. The words "or Rajpramukh" omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
  2. The words "or Rajpramukh, as the case may be" omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
  3. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 50, for "six months" (w.e.f. 3-1-1977) and further subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 38, for "one year from the date of the passing of the second of the resolutions approving the Proclamation under clause (3)" (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  4. Subs. by s. 50, ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976], for "six months" (w.e.f. 3-1-1977) and further subs. by s. 38, ibid., for "one year", respectively (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  5. Ins. by the Constitution (Sixty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1990, s. 2 (w.e.f. 16-4-1990).
  6. Subs. by the Constitution (Sixty-seventh Amendment) Act, 1990, s. 2 (w.e.f. 4-10-1990) and further subs. by the Constitution (Sixty-eighth Amendment) Act, 1991, s. 2 (w.e.f. 12-3-1991).
  7. Ins. by the Constitution (Thirty-eighth Amendment) Act, 1975, s. 6 (with retrospective effect) and subsequently subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 38, for cl. (5) (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  8. Proviso omitted by the Constitution (Sixty-third Amendment) Act, 1989, s. 2 (w.e.f. 6-1-1990) and subsequently ins. by the Constitution (Sixty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1990, s. 2 (w.e.f. 16-4-1990).

In plain English

If the President is satisfied, on the Governor’s report or otherwise, that the government of a State cannot be carried on in accordance with the Constitution, the President may take over the State’s government (“President’s Rule”) and let Parliament exercise the State Legislature’s powers. Parliament must approve it within two months; it can ordinarily last up to three years. Since Bommai, the proclamation can be reviewed by the courts.

Judgments The President’s Rule case (1994) · The Article 370 case (2023)

#article-356

Article 358 Suspension of provisions of article 19 during emergencies

1[(1)] 2[While a Proclamation of Emergency declaring that the security of India or any part of the territory thereof is threatened by war or by external aggression is in operation], nothing in article 19 shall restrict the power of the State as defined in Part III to make any law or to take any executive action which the State would but for the provisions contained in that Part be competent to make or to take, but any law so made shall, to the extent of the incompetency, cease to have effect as soon as the Proclamation ceases to operate, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before the law so ceases to have effect:

3[Provided that 4[where such Proclamation of Emergency] is in operation only in any part of the territory of India, any such law may be made, or any such executive action may be taken, under this article in relation to or in any State or Union territory in which or in any part of which the Proclamation of Emergency is not in operation, if and in so far as the security of India or any part of the territory thereof is threatened by activities in or in relation to the part of the territory of India in which the Proclamation of Emergency is in operation.]

5[(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall apply—

(a) to any law which does not contain a recital to the effect that such law is in relation to the Proclamation of Emergency in operation when it is made; or

(b) to any executive action taken otherwise than under a law containing such a recital.]

Notes in the official text (5)
  1. Art. 358 re-numbered as cl. (1) by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 39 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  2. Subs. by s. 39, ibid [the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978], for "While a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation" (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  3. Added by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 52 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).
  4. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 39, for "where a Proclamation of Emergency" (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  5. Ins. by s. 39, ibid. [the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978] (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

In plain English

During a national emergency declared on the ground of war or external aggression, the freedoms in Article 19 are automatically suspended, so laws and executive action inconsistent with them cannot be challenged while the emergency lasts. This does not apply to an emergency declared on the ground of armed rebellion.

#article-358

Article 359 Suspension of the enforcement of the rights conferred by Part III during emergencies

(1) Where a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, the President may by order declare that the right to move any court for the enforcement of such of 1[the rights conferred by Part III (except articles 20 and 21)] as may be mentioned in the order and all proceedings pending in any court for the enforcement of the rights so mentioned shall remain suspended for the period during which the Proclamation is in force or for such shorter period as may be specified in the order.

2[(1A) While an order made under clause (1) mentioning any of 1[the rights conferred by Part III (except articles 20 and 21)] is in operation, nothing in that Part conferring those rights shall restrict the power of the State as defined in the said Part to make any law or to take any executive action which the State would but for the provisions contained in that Part be competent to make or to take, but any law so made shall, to the extent of the incompetency, cease to have effect as soon as the order aforesaid ceases to operate, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before the law so ceases to have effect:]

3[Provided that where a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation only in any part of the territory of India, any such law may be made, or any such executive action may be taken, under this article in relation to or in any State or Union territory in which or in any part of which the Proclamation of Emergency is not in operation, if and in so far as the security of India or any part of the territory thereof is threatened by activities in or in relation to the part of the territory of India in which the Proclamation of Emergency is in operation.]

4[(1B) Nothing in clause (1A) shall apply—

(a) to any law which does not contain a recital to the effect that such law is in relation to the Proclamation of Emergency in operation when it is made; or

(b) to any executive action taken otherwise than under a law containing such a recital.]

(2) An order made as aforesaid may extend to the whole or any part of the territory of India:

5[Provided that where a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation only in a part of the territory of India, any such order shall not extend to any other part of the territory of India unless the President, being satisfied that the security of India or any part of the territory thereof is threatened by activities in or in relation to the part of the territory of India in which the Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, considers such extension to be necessary.]

(3) Every order made under clause (1) shall, as soon as may be after it is made, be laid before each House of Parliament.

Notes in the official text (5)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 40, for "the rights conferred by Part III" (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  2. Ins. by the Constitution (Thirty-eighth Amendment) Act, 1975, s. 7 (with retrospective effect).
  3. Added by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 53 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).
  4. Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 40 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  5. Added by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 53 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).

In plain English

During a national emergency, the President may by order suspend the right to move any court to enforce the fundamental rights named in the order, except the rights in Articles 20 and 21, which the Forty-fourth Amendment (1978) placed beyond suspension.

Judgments The habeas corpus case (1976)

#article-359

Article 360 Provisions as to financial emergency

(1) If the President is satisfied that a situation has arisen whereby the financial stability or credit of India or of any part of the territory thereof is threatened, he may by a Proclamation make a declaration to that effect.

1[(2) A Proclamation issued under clause (1)— (a) may be revoked or varied by a subsequent Proclamation;

(b) shall be laid before each House of Parliament;

(c) shall cease to operate at the expiration of two months, unless before the expiration of that period it has been approved by resolutions of both Houses of Parliament:

Provided that if any such Proclamation is issued at a time when the

House of the People has been dissolved or the dissolution of the House of the People takes place during the period of two months referred to in sub-clause (c), and if a resolution approving the Proclamation has been passed

by the Council of States, but no resolution with respect to such Proclamation has been passed by the House of the People before the expiration of that period, the Proclamation shall cease to operate at the expiration of thirty days from the

date on which the House of the People first sits after its reconstitution unless before the expiration of the said period of thirty days a resolution approving the Proclamation has been also passed by the House of the People.]

(3) During the period any such Proclamation as is mentioned in

clause (1) is in operation, the executive authority of the Union shall extend to the giving of directions to any State to observe such canons of financial propriety as may be specified in the directions, and to the giving of such other

directions as the President may deem necessary and adequate for the purpose. (4) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution— (a) any such direction may include—

(i) a provision requiring the reduction of salaries and allowances of all or any class of persons serving in connection with the affairs of a State;

(ii) a provision requiring all Money Bills or other Bills to which the provisions of article 207 apply to be reserved for the consideration of the President after they are passed by the Legislature

of the State; (b) it shall be competent for the President during the period any Proclamation issued under this article is in operation to issue directions

for the reduction of salaries and allowances of all or any class of persons

serving in connection with the affairs of the Union including the Judges

of the Supreme Court and the High Courts.

2[(5) * * * * *]

Notes in the official text (2)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 41, for cl. (2) (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).
  2. Ins. by the Constitution (Thirty-eighth Amendment) Act, 1975, s. 8 (with retrospective effect) and omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 41 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

In plain English

The President may proclaim a financial emergency if the financial stability or credit of India is threatened. It has never been used.

#article-360

Parts XX and XXI

Amending the Constitution, and Article 370

How the Constitution changes, and the special provision for Jammu and Kashmir that has ceased to operate.

Article 368 1[Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and procedure therefor]

2[(1) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, Parliament may in exercise of its constituent power amend by way of addition, variation or repeal any provision of this Constitution in accordance with the procedure laid down in this article.]

3[(2)] An amendment of this Constitution may be initiated only by the introduction of a Bill for the purpose in either House of Parliament, and when the Bill is passed in each House by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting, 4[it shall be presented to the President who shall give his assent to the Bill and thereupon] the Constitution shall stand amended in accordance with the terms of the Bill:

Provided that if such amendment seeks to make any change in—

(a) article 54, article 55, article 73, 5[ article 162, article 241 or article 279A]; or

(b) Chapter IV of Part V, Chapter V of Part VI, or Chapter I of Part XI; or

(c) any of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule; or

(d) the representation of States in Parliament; or

(e) the provisions of this article,

the amendment shall also require to be ratified by the Legislatures of not less than one-half of the States 6*** by resolutions to that effect passed by those Legislatures before the Bill making provision for such amendment is presented to the President for assent.

7[(3) Nothing in article 13 shall apply to any amendment made under this article.]

8[(4) No amendment of this Constitution (including the provisions of Part III) made or purporting to have been made under this article [whether before or after the commencement of section 55 of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976] shall be called in question in any court on any ground.

(5) For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that there shall be no limitation whatever on the constituent power of Parliament to amend by way of addition, variation or repeal the provisions of this Constitution under this article.]

Notes in the official text (8)
  1. Subs. by the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971, s. 3, for "Procedure for amendment of the Constitution" (w.e.f. 5-11-1971).
  2. Ins. by s. 3, ibid. [the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971] (w.e.f. 5-11-1971).
  3. Art. 368 re-numbered as cl. (2) thereof by s. 3, ibid. [the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971] (w.e.f. 5-11-1971).
  4. Subs. by s. 3, ibid. [the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971], (w.e.f. 5-11-1971).
  5. Subs. by the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, s. 15, for the words and figures "article 162 or article 241" (w.e.f. 16-9-2016).
  6. The words and letters "specified in Part A and Part B of the First Schedule" omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
  7. Ins. by the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971, s. 3 (w.e.f. 5-11-1971).
  8. Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 55 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977). This section has been declared invalid by the Supreme Court in Minerva Mills Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others AIR 1980 SC 1789.

In plain English

Parliament amends the Constitution by a Bill passed in each House by a majority of its total membership and two-thirds of those present and voting; the President must then assent. Changes to some federal provisions also need ratification by half the State Legislatures. Clauses (4) and (5), which tried to bar courts from reviewing amendments, are printed in the official text but were struck down in Minerva Mills; the basic structure doctrine limits what an amendment can do.

Judgments The First Amendment case (1951) · The Golaknath case (1967) · The basic structure case (1973) · The Minerva Mills case (1980)

#article-368

Article 370 Temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir

(1) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution,—

(a) the provisions of article 238 shall not apply in relation to the State of Jammu and Kashmir;

(b) the power of Parliament to make laws for the said State shall be limited to—

(i) those matters in the Union List and the Concurrent List which, in consultation with the Government of the State, are declared by the President to correspond to matters specified in the Instrument of Accession governing the accession of the State to the Dominion of India as the matters with respect to which the Dominion Legislature may make laws for that State; and

(ii) such other matters in the said Lists as, with the concurrence of the Government of the State, the President may by order specify.

Explanation.—For the purposes of this article, the Government of the State means the person for the time being recognised by the President as the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir acting on the advice of the Council of Ministers for the time being in office under the Maharaja’s Proclamation dated the fifth day of March, 1948;

(c) the provisions of article 1 and of this article shall apply in relation to that State;

(d) such of the other provisions of this Constitution shall apply in relation to that State subject to such exceptions and modifications as the President may by order1 specify:

Provided that no such order which relates to the matters specified in the Instrument of Accession of the State referred to in paragraph (i) of sub-clause (b) shall be issued except in consultation with the Government of the State:

Provided further that no such order which relates to matters other than those referred to in the last preceding proviso shall be issued except with the concurrence of that Government.

(2) If the concurrence of the Government of the State referred to in paragraph (ii) of sub-clause (b) of clause (1) or in the second proviso to sub-clause (d) of that clause be given before the Constituent Assembly for the purpose of framing the Constitution of the State is convened, it shall be placed before such Assembly for such decision as it may take thereon.

(3) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this article, the President may, by public notification, declare that this article shall cease to be operative or shall be operative only with such exceptions and modifications and from such date as he may specify:

Provided that the recommendation of the 2[clause (2) of Legislative Assembly of the State] shall be necessary before the President issues such a notification.

Notes in the official text (4)
  1. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (3) of article 370 read with clause (1) of article 370 of the Constitution of India, the President, on the recommendation of Parliament, is pleased to declare that, as from the 6th August, 2019 all clauses of said article 370 shall cease to be operative except the following which shall read as under, namely:— “370. All provisions of this Constitution, as amended from time to time, without any modifications or exceptions, shall apply to the State of Jammu and Kashmir notwithstanding anything contrary contained in article 152 or article 308 or any other article of this Constitution or any other provision of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir or any law, document, judgment, ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having the force of law in the territory of India, or any other instrument, treaty or agreement as envisaged under article 363 or otherwise.”. (See Appendix III) (C.O. 273).
  2. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (3) of the Constitution of India, the President, on the recommendation of the Constituent Assembly of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, declared that, as from the 17th day of November, 1952, the said art. 370 shall be operative with the modification that for the Explanation in cl. (1) thereof, the following Explanation is substituted, namely:— “Explanation.–For the purposes of this article, the Government of the State means the person for the time being recognised by the President on the recommendation of the Legislative Assembly of the State as the *Sadar-I-Riyasat of Jammu and Kashmir, acting on the advice of the Council of Ministers of the State for the time being in office.”. (C.O. 44, dated the 15th November, 1952). *Now “Governor”.
  3. See Appendix II.
  4. Subs. by C.O. 272, dated the 5-8-2019, s.2. for “Constituent Assembly of the State referred to in clause (2)” (w.e.f. 5-8-2019).

In plain English

Article 370 gave Jammu and Kashmir a special status, limiting Parliament’s power to make laws for the State. In August 2019 the President, under clause (3), declared that all its clauses ceased to operate except a new version applying the whole Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir; the footnotes reproduce the declaration. The Supreme Court upheld this in December 2023.

Judgments The Article 370 case (2023)

#article-370

The articles are the text. The judgments are how it lives.

Walk the corridor of landmark judgments, from Gopalan to electoral bonds, or practise legal reasoning on CLAT-style passages.

Prepare with CLATcoach, free

A free account gives you a full mock, a past paper for every exam, the daily questions, twelve Legal GK headings and a report on where you stand.

Create a free account