Choose the best replacement for the underlined portion: "Scarcely had the verdict been announced when the crowd erupted into applause."

Scarcely the verdict had been announced when

Scarcely had the verdict been announced than

Hardly had the verdict been announced then

Choose the best replacement for the underlined portion: "Being a rainy day, the match was cancelled."

Because of rainy day, the match was cancelled

Rainy day being, the match was cancelled

Choose the best replacement for the underlined portion: "No sooner he saw the police than he ran away."

No sooner he saw the police than

No sooner did he see the police when

No sooner he had seen the police than

Choose the best replacement for the underlined portion: "He is one of the best lawyer in the city."

one of the best lawyer in the city

one of the best lawyer's in the city

English · Micro-Test

Sentence Correction and Improvement

Sentence correction questions give you a full sentence with one part marked, and ask you to choose the best replacement from several options, including sometimes the original.

10 questions · 5 minutes · instant scoring

What this topic actually tests

Sentence correction differs from error-spotting in what it demands of you: error-spotting only requires locating which part of a sentence is wrong, while sentence correction requires actively selecting the specific replacement that fixes the problem correctly, among several options that may each fix it partially, incorrectly, or introduce a new error. This makes sentence correction a stricter test, because a distractor option might correct the original mistake while introducing a different one, or might "over-correct" a sentence that was already grammatically acceptable. Several rule clusters recur heavily: verb tense sequencing, especially the third conditional structure ("if the contract had been signed earlier, the dispute could have been avoided" — not "would have been signed" in the if-clause, since English conditionals never use "would have" in the condition itself, only in the result); the subjunctive mood used for hypothetical or wishful statements ("I wish I were taller," not "I wish I was taller," because the subjunctive "were" is required after "wish" and after hypothetical "if" regardless of subject number); inversion structures following negative adverbials such as "no sooner," "scarcely," and "hardly," which require an auxiliary verb inversion and specific pairing words ("no sooner... than," but "scarcely/hardly... when," never "no sooner... when" or "scarcely... than"); and dangling or misplaced modifiers, where an introductory phrase must logically describe the subject immediately following it ("being a rainy day, the match was cancelled" is wrong because the match, not the day, is the subject — the corrected version needs "as it was a rainy day" or "it being a rainy day" to supply a logical subject for the participial phrase). The method is to first identify which rule category the underlined portion implicates, then test each option against that specific rule rather than against a vague sense of "sounding right," since fluent-sounding options are frequently the intended distractors.

The common trap on this topic

The most frequent mistake is selecting an option that fixes the obvious surface issue but violates a secondary rule the test-taker overlooked — for instance, correctly changing a singular-plural mismatch while failing to notice the same option also shifted the sentence into the wrong tense. A second trap is "hypercorrection": choosing a more complex or formal-sounding replacement for a sentence that was already grammatically correct as given, because the underlined portion looks unusual or old-fashioned (constructions like "scarcely had the verdict been announced when the crowd erupted" are correct standard English, yet aspirants often "fix" them unnecessarily since inversion is uncommon in casual speech). A third trap is misapplying an inversion rule from one negative adverbial to another — "no sooner" strictly pairs with "than," and "scarcely" and "hardly" strictly pair with "when," but these pairings are frequently swapped by aspirants who remember that inversion is required without remembering which connecting word belongs to which adverbial. Always isolate the specific grammatical rule being tested before comparing the answer options against each other.

FAQ

What is the difference between error spotting and sentence correction on CLAT?

Error spotting asks you to identify which segment of a sentence is wrong, without providing a fix. Sentence correction asks you to select the specific replacement phrase that correctly fixes an underlined portion, testing your ability to produce the correction, not just locate the problem.

How do I know if a sentence correction option is "No improvement" or the original is already correct?

Check the underlined portion against the specific grammar rule it implicates (tense sequencing, subjunctive mood, inversion, modifier placement). If it already satisfies that rule precisely, the original is correct and any "corrected" alternative is likely an unnecessary or incorrect hypercorrection.

Why do conditional sentences trip up so many aspirants in sentence correction?

Because spoken English frequently (and incorrectly) uses "would have" in the if-clause of a third conditional, aspirants internalise this error as normal. Standard written English restricts "would have" to the result clause only, using the past perfect ("had + past participle") in the if-clause.

Keep practising

Ready to see the full picture?

This micro-test covers one topic. The full CLAT diagnostic covers all five sections in 30 minutes and gives you a section-wise breakdown of where you actually stand.

Take the Full Diagnostic →