34 days left — Registration closes 2026-10-31.

Library · Part I: Traditions & Culture

Dress, Etiquette & Customs

23 entries. The first 5 are free to read; all 23 are yours with Plus.

Read all 23 from ₹1,499Open in your dashboard

The Advocate's Dress Code

Black and white

Under the Bar Council of India Rules (Part VI, Chapter IV), made under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act, male advocates wear a black buttoned-up coat, chapkan, achkan or sherwani with white bands, or a black open-collar coat with a white shirt and bands; women advocates wear a black full-sleeve jacket or blouse, white bands and a saree or other traditional dress. Gowns are required only in the Supreme Court and High Courts. Wearing a black coat is optional in lower courts during summer.

  • Gowns are compulsory only in the Supreme Court and High Courts.
Quick check: Under the BCI Rules, the advocate's gown is compulsory in:
  1. Only trial courts
  2. All courts
  3. The Supreme Court and High Courts only
  4. Only the Supreme Court

Answer: C.

Why White Bands?

Tablets of the law

The white bands worn by advocates descend from the collars of English clerical and academic dress. A popular explanation is that the two strips represent the tablets of the law; this is a later symbolic reading rather than documented history.

  • The "tablets of the law" explanation is symbolic.

Why Black?

Authority and a legend of mourning

Black is said to represent authority, dignity and submission to justice, and it hides the wear of daily court use. A popular legend traces the English Bar's black gowns to mourning for a monarch — often said to be Queen Mary II in 1694 or Charles II — but historians regard these stories as unproven.

  • The mourning stories are legend, not established fact.

Wigs in Indian Courts

A colonial relic dropped

Judges and barristers in British India's High Courts followed English court dress, including wigs in some courts. The practice was abandoned after independence, and Indian judges and advocates do not wear wigs.

2006

"My Lord" or "Your Honour"?

Forms of address

In 2006 the Bar Council of India adopted a rule (Rule 49(1)(j) of its Rules) that advocates may address the Supreme Court and High Courts as "Your Honour" or "Hon'ble Court", and subordinate courts as "Sir" or its equivalent in regional languages, instead of the colonial "My Lord" and "Your Lordship". Many advocates still use the older forms, and several judges have asked lawyers not to.

  • BCI rule of 2006.
Quick check: Under the Bar Council of India's 2006 rule, advocates may address the Supreme Court and High Courts as:
  1. "My Lord" only
  2. "Sir" only
  3. "Your Majesty"
  4. "Your Honour" or "Hon'ble Court"

Answer: D.

18 more entries under this heading

PlusAll 23 entries, and every heading in the LibraryYours from ₹1,499, till CLAT 2028See Plus

Or start free: twelve headings are open in full.