Supreme Court: NDPS accused's prolonged detention violated Article 22(2) of the Constitution
Sujit Das, Suman Das and Rupak Sarkar were accused under several sections of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, including 21(C), 22(C), 23(C), 25, 25A, 28 and 29. The High Court of Tripura at Agartala, by a common order, dismissed their regular bail applications. The Supreme Court found that their detention, from the time their liberty was first curtailed, had gone beyond the 24-hour period within which Article 22(2) of the Constitution and Section 58 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (the successor to Section 57 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) require production before a magistrate, and that the overall detention exceeded what was reasonable in the circumstances.
The Court laid down that a magistrate, on production of an accused, must record the exact date and time detention began, verify whether the 24-hour deadline was met, and independently assess whether the detention — even if within 24 hours — had lasted longer than reasonable; if so, remand must be declined. Finding both breaches here, the Court set aside the High Court's order, directed the appellants be produced before the jurisdictional Special Court within seven days, and ordered their release on bail on appropriate terms, with a copy of the judgment circulated to police chiefs and High Courts nationwide.
Quick checkIn Sujit Das v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held the accused's continued detention breached Article 22(2) of the Constitution because:- the detention exceeded what was reasonable, going beyond the 24-hour production requirement under Section 58 of the BNSS
- the accused were denied access to legal aid
- the FIR did not disclose a cognizable offence
- the Special Court lacked territorial jurisdiction over the case
Show the answer ↓
Answer: A. The Court found the magistrate had not verified the actual time of detention or assessed whether it exceeded the reasonable period required by Article 22(2) read with Section 58 BNSS (Section 57 CrPC), beyond the bare 24-hour limit.
Issued by Supreme Court of India. If this summary and the source differ, the source is right — tell us and we will correct it.
Revising the month? All 33 legal updates from November 2026 →