Madras HC: a school's clerical slip nearly cost 20 students their college admissions
When a private CBSE-affiliated school in Karaikudi mixed up the order of subjects on its own submission to the Board, twenty families found their children's college admissions suddenly at risk. The school had listed each student's core academic subject, whether Mathematics, Biology, Computer Science or Accountancy, in the sixth, or additional-subject, slot on the official List of Candidates, with Physical Education wrongly recorded among the first five main subjects, even though the students had studied and been examined in the academic subject as their real elective. Because many undergraduate courses count only the first five subjects for eligibility, this clerical sequencing threatened to shut the students out of courses they had otherwise qualified for.
The school openly admitted the mistake was its own and said it had disciplined the staff member responsible, but the Central Board of Secondary Education refused to simply rearrange its records after results were declared, citing signed registration forms and its own scheme. Justice L. Victoria Gowri, calling the transition to undergraduate study a decisive stage in a student's life, held that a subject does not lose its academic standing merely for appearing sixth, and directed the school to issue each student an individual, corrected statement of what they had actually studied and passed, for the Board to consider and for the students to place before whichever college they sought admission to. The school was strictly reprimanded.
Quick checkIn Malar S. v. CBSE, what did the Madras High Court hold about a recognised academic subject that a student had studied and passed, even though it was recorded sixth (as an 'additional subject') due to the school's error?- It becomes void and cannot be counted at all
- CBSE must automatically move it to the first five subjects
- The student must retake the examination
- It does not become a subject of lesser academic standing merely for appearing sixth, though its treatment for eligibility is governed by the admitting institution's own rules
Show the answer ↓
Answer: D. The Court held that the subject's academic standing is unaffected by its position in the record, but left it to each admitting institution's own rules to decide how an additional subject counts for eligibility.
Issued by Madras High Court. If this summary and the source differ, the source is right — tell us and we will correct it.